H&I 2026/261
Kuijt v the Netherlands. No objectively justified doubts about impartiality of Dutch supreme court panel. European Court of Human Rights
EHRM 23-09-2026, ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0923DEC001936519, m.nt. Edwin Thomas (Kuijt t. Nederland)
- Instantie
Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens
- Datum
23 september 2026
- Magistraten
M. Guyomar, A. Bårdsen, I. Jelić, L. Chanturia, I. Ktistakis, K. Šimáčková, G. A. Serghides, J. Schukking, D. Pavli, E. Wennerström, D. Sârcu, D. Derenčinović, Ú. Ní Raifeartaigh, A. Chablais, A. Adamska-Gallant, V. Grigoryan, V. Sancin
- Zaaknummer
19365/19
- Noot
Edwin Thomas
- Roepnaam
Kuijt t. Nederland
- JCDI
JCDI:BSD127302:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Europees belastingrecht / Mensenrechten
Fiscaal procesrecht / Procesorde
Staatsrecht / Rechtspraak
- Brondocumenten
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0923DEC001936519, Uitspraak, Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens, 23‑09‑2026
- Wetingang
European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) Article 6 paragraph 1
Essentie
Decision from the European Court of Human Rights in the case Kuijt v. the Netherlands. The Grand Chamber declared the application inadmissible. The applicant argued that her cassation appeal before the Dutch Supreme Court had not been heard by an independent, impartial tribunal established by law because judges not assigned to her case (reservisten) could participate in deliberations. The Court held that, insofar as the complaint concerned judicial independence and the 'tribunal established by law' requirement, domestic remedies had not been exhausted because those arguments had not been raised in the main cassation proceedings. As regards impartiality, the Court ... Verder lezen? Log in om dit document te bekijken.