H&I 2026/113
Toska ehf. and Lyf og heilsa hf. v EFTA Surveillance Authority. Application ne bis in idem principle. EFTA Court
EFTA 05-03-2026, E-31/24, E-32/24 (Uitspraak), m.nt. Edwin Thomas (Toska ehf. and Lyf og heilsa hf. v EFTA Surveillance Authority; SKEL fjárfestingafélag hf. v EFTA Surveillance Authority)
- Instantie
European Free Trade Association
- Datum
5 maart 2026
- Magistraten
P. Hreinsson, B. Hammermann, M. Reiertsen
- Zaaknummer
E-31/24
E-32/24
- Noot
Edwin Thomas
- Roepnaam
Toska ehf. and Lyf og heilsa hf. v EFTA Surveillance Authority; SKEL fjárfestingafélag hf. v EFTA Surveillance Authority
- JCDI
JCDI:BSD104108:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Europees belastingrecht / Mensenrechten
Europees belastingrecht / Algemeen
- Brondocumenten
Uitspraak, European Free Trade Association, 05‑03‑2026
- Wetingang
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union Article 50, 51
Essentie
The contested decisions concerned ESA’s investigations into potential anti-competitive agreements and/or concerted practices on the Icelandic retail pharmacy market upon which Toska and SKEL are active. Toska argued, inter alia, that the investigation breached the fundamental rights of legal certainty and ne bis in idem. The Court thus found that ESA had competence to investigate the suspected anti-competitive conduct and that the investigation did not breach the fundamental principles of legal certainty and ne bis in idem.
Samenvatting
The joined cases before the EFTA Court (EFTA 5 March 2026, E‑31/24 Toska ehf. and Lyf og heilsa hf. ... Verder lezen? Log in om dit document te bekijken.