EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation: from ISD to MiFID II
Einde inhoudsopgave
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/18.III.3:18.III.3 Factor 3: technological innovation
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/18.III.3
18.III.3 Factor 3: technological innovation
Documentgegevens:
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás, datum 01-02-2021
- Datum
01-02-2021
- Auteur
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS266500:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Bank- en effectenrecht
Financieel recht / Europees financieel recht
Financiële dienstverlening / Financieel toezicht
Deze functie is alleen te gebruiken als je bent ingelogd.
Besides market philosophies and market structure, technological innovation has been a main element that influenced the EU perspective. As demonstrated in the previous chapters, the EU adapted its view concerning the optimal degree of equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation depending on technological innovation. From the ISD to MiFID II four main consequences of technological innovation have been: (1) the shift from phone/telephone to predominantly electronic markets; (2) new venues; (3) new trading possibilities; and (4) the increase in technological infrastructures (performing calculations and operating databases) in making the EU transparency rules work.
18.III.3.1 Shift towards electronic trading18.III.3.2 New types of venues18.III.3.3 New trading techniques18.III.3.4 More calculations and databases18.III.3.5 Interim conclusion