Einde inhoudsopgave
Corporate Social Responsibility (IVOR nr. 77) 2010/7.3.3
7.3.3 Other reasons for executing due diligence
Mr. T.E. Lambooy, datum 17-11-2010
- Datum
17-11-2010
- Auteur
Mr. T.E. Lambooy
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS364579:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Ondernemingsrecht (V)
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
This list is based on the author's experience as a corporate lawyer and on the Loyens & Loeff Handbook: Due Diligence Law and Practice (1997, 2
'Change of Control' clauses allow one or both parties to terminate the agreement on a change in ownership of a controlling interest in the other party. The rationale is that upon a change of a controlling interest by one party, the other party does not have to deal with an undesirable new party - the new owner. They are quite common in debt and lease agreements as well as in substantial supplier contracts. See further: D. Rankine, M. Bomer, G. Stedman, Due diligence: definitive steps to successful business combination (Pearson Education Limited: Harlow, Essex, 2003), at p. 94.
' Conditions precedent' refers to the conditions, which if not fulfilled, could impede the execution of the contractual obligations. The completion of a due diligence investigation can be a condition precedent to the obligation to complete the purchase.
ABP/Hoog Catherijne supra note 24.
Compare OGEM, Amsterdam Enterprise Chamber 3 December 1987 and DSC 10 January 1990 (NJ1990/466) concerning mismanagement due to an inadequate preparation of acquisitions; Verto, Amsterdam Enterprise Chamber 7 March 1996 (NJ1997/674) - the fact that the directors had not performed a due diligence investigation in view ofa business acquisition was judged not to be diligent; however, special circumstances in this case (i.e. prior knowledge concerning the target company) led to the judgement that there had been no mismanagement; Verto, The Hague CoA 6 April 1999 (NJ1999/142) concerning the personal liability of the directors (rejected); De Vries Robbe, DSC 13 September 2002 (LJN AE7940) concerning mismanagement by directors and supervisory directors; one of the questions concerned the quality of the due diligence process.
Besides legal reasons, companies also mention other reasons, of a more practical nature, why they perform a due diligence investigation. For example, the motivation of a bank to carry out a due diligence inspection before granting a loan is to ascertain, firstly, whether the company can repay the loan and generate sufficient cash flow to pay for the periodical interest and, secondly, to identify collateral and to determine its value. A risk analysis of the company, its business, the industry and the geographical region usually forms part of a finance due diligence.
The reason for initiating a due diligence analysis before concluding an operational agreement is that the company needs to know about the operational and business opportunities, the value of the proposed contract, and which obstacles and risks can be expected. Other drivers for a due diligence investigation are:1
evaluating possible synergies for a merger, e.g. in the type of business activities or geographical markets, new opportunities or innovative approaches;
verification of assumptions regarding the business or the price offered;
avoidance of ' skeletons in the cupboard' (unexpected liabilities);
finding arguments for renegotiating the price;
examining whether permission from third parties is required for the transaction, e.g. pursuant to legislation or contractual change of control' clauses.2 Certain transactions require government consent, e.g. in the Netherlands, for the sale of a bank, permission has to be obtained from the Minister of Finance; for transactions with a EU dimension, the approval of the EU Commission is required pursuant to EU competition law;
to optimise the transaction structure (e.g. to consider legal and tax variations: a share or asset purchase? Should a new company be incorporated to acquire the new business? If so, under which jurisdiction?);
identification of ' conditions precedent'3 which are applicable to concluding the transaction (e.g. supervisory board or shareholders' approval, consultation with unions or works councils, third-party consent);
preparation of the ' representations and warranties' that will become part of the transaction documentation;4
to substantiate taking a decision on concluding the transaction: YES or NO?
to avoid mismanagement and directors' liability (due to unfunded investment decisions);5 and
to prepare a to-do-list concerning improvements which need to be made after the transaction has been concluded.
In sum, there are various reasons for companies to commence a commercial due diligence investigation. Some reasons are aimed at gaining a better understanding of the target business. Other reasons are more transaction-related, such as the preparation of the best tax structure for the acquisition or joint venture, or the analysis of which steps need to be taken before the transaction can take place. There are also reasons of a more practical nature: to find assets over which to demand a security right. To date, companies did not consider human rights concerns as a typical subject to be included in a due diligence assessment.