EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation: from ISD to MiFID II
Einde inhoudsopgave
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/3.II.5:3.II.5 Background
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/3.II.5
3.II.5 Background
Documentgegevens:
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás, datum 01-02-2021
- Datum
01-02-2021
- Auteur
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS266512:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Bank- en effectenrecht
Financieel recht / Europees financieel recht
Financiële dienstverlening / Financieel toezicht
Deze functie is alleen te gebruiken als je bent ingelogd.
The foregoing illustrates that the ISD pre-trade transparency regime for RMs was rather limited. The ISD pre-trade transparency obligation was minimum harmonised and limited in detail. Publication of pre-trade data was not required under the ISD. Instead, the ISD only required a fixed price for published pre-trade data on RMs. Similar flexibility was in place with respect to the ISD exceptions. The limited pre-trade transparency provisions made the ISDbottom-up. Member States and, where permitted by national regulation, also RMs themselves had great flexibility with respect to pre-trade transparency. The bottom-up approach is best understood against the background of the ISD drafting process. At least three elements determined the ISD’s bottom-up approach with respect to pre-trade transparency regulation for RMs.
3.II.5.1 Different market structures3.II.5.2 Minimum harmonisation3.II.5.3 Limited implementing powers for EU institutions