Einde inhoudsopgave
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/18.III.3.3.2
18.III.3.3.2 Algorithmic trading in general
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás, datum 01-02-2021
- Datum
01-02-2021
- Auteur
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS266671:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Bank- en effectenrecht
Financieel recht / Europees financieel recht
Financiële dienstverlening / Financieel toezicht
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
D. Morgan, ‘Navigating dark and lit venues using algorithms and smart order routing’, in Algorithmic Trading & Smart Order Routing, 4th Edition, The Trade, 2011, p. 83-84. For example, algorithms can decide to buy a large block of Royal Dutch Shell shares (‘what’) during the closing auction, based on the volume weighted average price (VWAP) benchmark (‘when’). The SOR, based on algorithms, can decide to split the order into smaller pieces and divide them across multiple venues in which Royal Dutch Shell shares are traded (‘where’) in order to reduce market impact (ibid).
ECB, Occasional Paper Series: Dark pools in European equity markets: emergence, competition and implications, July 2017, p. 4.
ESMA, MiFID II/MiFIR Review Report No. 1: On the development in prices for pre- and post-trade data and on the consolidated tape for equity instruments, 5 December 2019(ESMA70-156-1606), p. 14-15.
ESMA, MiFID II/MiFIR Review Report No. 1: On the development in prices for pre- and post-trade data and on the consolidated tape for equity instruments, 5 December 2019(ESMA70-156-1606), p. 13-15.
During the MiFID I timeframe technological innovation also resulted in new trading possibilities. Under MiFID I technological developments resulted in trading based on algorithms. Simply put, trading algorithms make trading decisions, instead of humans (i.e. a type of artificial intelligence), in choosing ‘what’ to trade and ‘when’ using benchmarks. Algorithms also enable so-called smart order routers (SORs), instead of humans, to decide ‘where’ the order should be executed.1 The result is that algorithmic trading enables investment firms to keep pace with liquidity and the related pre-trade and post-trade data dispersed across a wide range of venues, which humans no longer can, thereby ensuring that orders still can be executed in accordance with best execution-obligations (e.g. find the best price, reduce market impact, and so forth).2 Algorithmic trading started under MiFID I and is commonplace in equity trading under MiFID II.3 The consequence of the growth in algorithmic trading is a growing demand for equity pre- and post-trade data (in particular so-called ‘non-display data’).4 The result is more emphasis of the EU on ‘reasonable’ and transparent prices of equity pre- and post-trade data, in particular since MiFID II.