EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation: from ISD to MiFID II
Einde inhoudsopgave
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/7.III.3:7.III.3 The dominant role of RMs in publishing post-trade information
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/7.III.3
7.III.3 The dominant role of RMs in publishing post-trade information
Documentgegevens:
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás, datum 01-02-2021
- Datum
01-02-2021
- Auteur
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS267099:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Bank- en effectenrecht
Financieel recht / Europees financieel recht
Financiële dienstverlening / Financieel toezicht
Toon alle voetnoten
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
K. Lannoo, Financial Market Data and MiFID, ECMI Policy Brief, March 2007, p. 1-2.
Deze functie is alleen te gebruiken als je bent ingelogd.
Many of the potential regulatory concerns raised by ATSs and order internalising systems were mitigated by the dominant position of RMs during the ISD timeframe. RMs were during the ISD timeframe – in addition to data vendors redistributing the RM data – mainly in charge of equity pre-trade data publication.1 There were at least three factors why this was the case, namely: (1) the optional ISD concentration-rule, (2) national regulation, and (3) modernization of RMs.
7.III.3.1 Factor 1: optional ISD concentration-rule7.III.3.2 Factor 2: national regulation7.III.3.3 Factor 3: modernization of EU RMs