Einde inhoudsopgave
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/4.V.2.2
4.V.2.2 MiFID I Database for Shares Admitted to Trading on an RM
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás, datum 01-02-2021
- Datum
01-02-2021
- Auteur
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS266935:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Bank- en effectenrecht
Financieel recht / Europees financieel recht
Financiële dienstverlening / Financieel toezicht
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
Art. 34(1-2) MiFID I Implementing Regulation. See in this context also CESR, Technical Advice on MiFID I, April 2005(CESR/05-290b), p. 70.
Art. 34(3) MiFID I Implementing Regulation and CESR, Guidebook on MiFID market transparency calculations, May 2007 (CESR/07-322). Where the save harbour-provision applied, NCAs were still permitted to publish the data themselves (in conjunction with CESR). The reason for simultaneous CESR and NCA publication could be to also have the data available in the own language (ibid).
CESR, Guidebook on MiFID market transparency calculations, May 2007 (CESR/07-322), p. 3-4 and CESR, Protocol on the Operation of CESR MiFID Database, December 2010 (CESR/09-172d), p. 9.
CESR gave detailed instructions on how to upload the data to the MiFID I Database to the NCAs separately (CESR, Guidebook on MiFID market transparency calculations, May 2007 (CESR/07-322), p. 3-4).
CESR, Guidebook on MiFID market transparency calculations, May 2007 (CESR/07-322), p. 3-4 and CESR, Protocol on the Operation of CESR MiFID Database, December 2010 (CESR/09-172d), p. 9.
CESR, Press Release: CESR publishes today the list of ‘Liquid Shares’ according to the MiFID, as well as all shares listed on EU RMs, July 2007 (CESR/07-450).
For an examination of the possibility for NCAs to designate liquid shares themselves, reference is made to section III, paragraph 2.2 above.
CESR, Consultation Paper on improving the functioning of the MiFID database, December 2007 (CESR/07-832), p. 2-3.
CESR, Feedback Statement: Improving the Functioning of the MiFID Database, February 2008 (CESR/08-147), p. 2-3.
CESR, Consultation Paper on improving the functioning of the MiFID database, December 2007 (CESR/07-832), p. 2-3.
CESR, Feedback Statement: Improving the Functioning of the MiFID Database, February 2008 (CESR/08-147), p. 2-3.
CESR, Feedback Statement: Improving the Functioning of the MiFID Database, February 2008 (CESR/08-147).
MiFID I required each NCA, in relation to each share admitted to trading on an RM for which it was the relevant NCA, to publish yearly calculations. The yearly calculations included: (a) the average daily turnover, (b) the average daily number of transactions, (c) the free float, and (d) the average value of orders executed (as calculated in accordance with the MiFID I provisions).1 In addition, MiFID I obliged the NCA to publish calculations and estimates as soon as practicable for (i) shares not yet admitted to trading on an RM, (ii) after the first admission to trading on an RM, and (iii) ad hoc calculations (as calculated/estimated in accordance with the MiFID I provisions).2 MiFID I required the relevant NCA to publish the results (e.g. through the NCA website).3 The NCA obligation was waived where CESR already published the results of the NCA (the so-called ‘save harbour’ provision for NCAs).4 The safe harbour-provision reflected two opposing ideas, namely: (1) leaving NCAs responsible for publishing the data and (2) the ability of CESR to ensure the data published would be of high (or at least the same) quality. CESR could publish the results of the NCA through the MiFID I Database for Shares Admitted to Trading on an RM (MiFID I Database).5
Besides NCAs, CESR itself was also subject to a MiFID I obligation. MiFID I obliged CESR to consolidate and regularly update the results of the individual NCAs in one place. CESR performed this task through the MiFID I Database.6 CESR provided guidance to ensure CESR was able to provide the consolidated and regularly updated data. CESR stated in its internal guidebook that the NCAs needed to send their data to CESR. CESR requested the NCAs to send the data in a harmonised format7 and well before the MiFID I publication deadlines.8 The consolidated data available in the MiFID I database enabled the market to recognise ‘liquid shares’ (including the related standard market size) and ‘large in scale orders’.9
The MiFID I database initially contained the following data fields: (a) ISIN (international securities identification number), (b) name of the share, (c) average daily turnover (ADT), (d) daily transactions, (e) free float, (f) average value of orders executed (AVO), (g) standard market size (based on the AVO), (h) NCA for a liquid share (if designating liquid shares themselves),10 (i) relevant NCA, and (j) country code.11 At a later point, the MiFID I Database also covered: (k) the exchange rate for non-Euro countries, (l) the date of update (when information was last updated), and (m) information indicating when the information became applicable (to facilitate the distinction between current and new data).12 In terms of search functions, it was possible to display per: (1) ISIN, (2) share name, (3) country, (4) NCA, (5) date and (6) column.13 Market participants could recognise liquid shares by a red bullet that was posted next to the ISIN or by using the so-called SMS field. At a later stage, the MiFID I database also contained a search function for (7) liquid shares.14 The aim of the MiFID I Database was to find a balance. A balance was intended between (i) a clear presentation of the data for market participants and (ii) not being too extensive (e.g. a methodology for determining exchange rates was not included) in order to ensure the smooth operation of the database.15