Einde inhoudsopgave
Exit rights of minority shareholders in a private limited company (IVOR nr. 72) 2010/6.6.5
6.6.5 Bring other parties into proceedings
mr. dr. P.P. de Vries, datum 03-05-2010
- Datum
03-05-2010
- Auteur
mr. dr. P.P. de Vries
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS405187:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Ondernemingsrecht (V)
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
Art. 2:343 paragraph 3 DCC, first sentence.
CE Art. 20 paragraph 1 Rv stipulating that the court should safeguard proceedings from unreasonable delay. Paragraph 2 of this provision obliges parties in the proceedings to avert unreasonable delay.
Parliamentary Papers II 2006/07, 31 058, no. 3 (MvT), p. 109-110.
The option to also bring the company into proceedings was added by way of the Note of Amendment, see Parliamentary Papers II 2008/09, 31 058, no. 7 (Nota van Wijziging), p. 10-11 and p. 19. The Combined Committee for Company Law is an advisory committee of the Royal Dutch Notarial Society and The Netherlands Bar Association.
If a shareholder is of the opinion that the exit proceedings should also or solely be started against one of his co-shareholders or against the company itself, he is entitled to bring this shareholder or the company into the proceedings (in vrijwaring oproepen).1 In order to bring the company or co-shareholder into proceedings, these must be summoned not later than the day of the statement of defence (conclusie van antwoord). Art. 2:343 paragraph 3 DCC does not allow that co-shareholders or the company are brought in later on. Pursuant to Art. 133 paragraph 2 RV parties may in conjunction withintly request for extension of the period in which statements can be exchanged. The court can deny this request if it leads to unreasonable delay of the proceedings.2
The general rules on bringing third parties into proceedings lead to the result an additional claim is started against the party brought in proceedings. In contrast to the general rules, in the exit proceedings, the party brought in becomes defendant in the main suit (hoofdzaak).3 This deviation of the general rules is included in order to speed up the proceedings, as no incidental claim is required (which creates a related set of proceedings).
The possibility to involve the company itself in the proceedings is included further to the suggestions of the Combined Committee for Company Law.4 For the reason that the exit proceedings can be started against the company as well, it makes sense that the company can also be brought into proceedings.