State aid to banks
Einde inhoudsopgave
State aid to banks (IVOR nr. 109) 2018/11.8.4:11.8.4 Concluding remarks
State aid to banks (IVOR nr. 109) 2018/11.8.4
11.8.4 Concluding remarks
Documentgegevens:
mr. drs. R.E. van Lambalgen, datum 01-12-2017
- Datum
01-12-2017
- Auteur
mr. drs. R.E. van Lambalgen
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS591801:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Europees financieel recht
Mededingingsrecht / EU-mededingingsrecht
Deze functie is alleen te gebruiken als je bent ingelogd.
Most restructuring plans of banks (in the C-context) include a re-focus on the bank’s core activities. This refocus on the bank’s core activities – and the subsequent disposal of the bank’s non-core activities – is always viewed positively by the Commission, because it contributes to the restoration of long-term viability.
The present section has shown that there is no uniform definition of ‘non-core activities’. The exact interpretation of ‘core’ and ‘non-core’ is different for each bank. Apart from the fact that it usually treats proprietary trading as a non-core activity, the Commission does not impose a uniform business model on the banks. In other words: banks and Member States have some flexibility in designing the business model of the bank. I welcome the fact that the Commission does not dictate which bank activities should be labelled as core and non- core. Indeed, it is not for the Commission – as a State aid control authority – to determine the business model of the bank.