H&I 2026/262
Commission v Belgium (Directive 2016/1164 – Double imposition). Belgium failed to implement mandatory CFC tax credit provision. ATAD. Court of Justice
CJ 26-02-2026, C-524/23 (Uitspraak), m.nt. Daniel Blum (Commission/Belgium)
- Instantie
Court of Justice of the European Union
- Datum
26 februari 2026
- Magistraten
M.L. Arastey Sahún, J. Passer, E. Regan, D. Gratsias, B. Smulders
- Zaaknummer
C-524/23
- Conclusie
A-G J. Kokott
- Noot
Daniel Blum
- Roepnaam
Commission/Belgium
- JCDI
JCDI:BSD128226:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Vennootschapsbelasting (V)
Europees belastingrecht / Algemeen
Europees belastingrecht / Voorkoming van dubbele belasting
- Brondocumenten
Uitspraak, Court of Justice of the European Union, 26‑02‑2026
Conclusie, Court of Justice of the European Union, 22‑05‑2025
- Wetingang
Council Directive (EU) 2016/1164 Article 7, 8 paragraph 7
Essentie
Judgment of the Court of Justice in the case Commission v Belgium (Directive 2016/1164 – Double imposition). Transposing Article 8(7) of Council Directive 2016/1164 is mandatory and applies to all CFC situations under Article 7 of Council Directive 2016/1164. The provision leaves no discretion to Member States. In this case, the European Commission brought infringement proceedings against Belgium for failing to implement Article 8(7) of the EU Anti‑Tax Avoidance Directive (Council Directive 2016/1164). This provision obliges Member States to allow taxpayers to deduct from their tax liability any tax already paid by their CFCs, preventing double taxation. ... Verder lezen? Log in om dit document te bekijken.