Einde inhoudsopgave
Treaty Application for Companies in a Group (FM nr. 178) 2022/6.2.3.7
6.2.3.7 Elimination of double taxation (art. 23 A and 23 B OECD MTC)
L.C. van Hulten, datum 06-07-2022
- Datum
06-07-2022
- Auteur
L.C. van Hulten
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS659341:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Omzetbelasting / Plaats van levering en dienst
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
OECD, Tax Challenges Arising from Digitalisation - Report on Pillar Two Blueprint: Inclusive Framework on BEPS, Paris: OECD Publishing 2020, p. 121. The Pillar Two proposal includes a switch-over-rule for tax treaties which applies to certain branch structures and makes sure that it is no longer necessary to apply the exemption method, even though this method is included in the respective income tax treaty. If the exemption method would be applied, it would be possible to blend low-tax income arising in the state of the permanent establishment with high tax income in the state of the parent jurisdiction. This would lead to understating the amount of low-tax income in the jurisdiction of the permanent establishment and would jeopardise the effectiveness of the Pillar Two rules. For completeness, the switch-over-rule is not included in the Pillar Two document published in December 2021 (OECD, Tax Challenges Arising from the Digitalisation of the Economy - Global Anti-Base Erosion Model Rules (Pillar Two): Inclusive Framework on BEPS, Paris: OECD Publishing 2021). As this rule concerns a tax treaty rule, it might be included in a separate proposal.
OECD, Tax Challenges Arising from Digitalisation - Report on Pillar One Blueprint: Inclusive Framework on BEPS, Paris: OECD Publishing 2020, p. 138 and 148-152.
Perhaps a solution could be to require the inclusion of a switch-over clause in tax treaties if the exemption method is chosen. See par. 6.3.8.
Under a unitary business approach, the country of the ultimate parent company would in principle be able to include all foreign profits of the unitary business in the levy of its domestic tax law. Subsequently, the OECD MTC would restrict the application of the domestic tax law. In this regard a proper method to allocate the profits to the various countries would have to be included in the model. For the country of the ultimate parent company of the unitary business it should be ensured that solely the profits allocable to that entity are taxed in the end. This would require a method to eliminate double taxation. The manner to eliminate double taxation is currently chosen in line with the tax policy goals of the country: it can either be the exemption method (CIN) or the credit method (CEN). As the intra-unitary business income would be consolidated and intra-group transactions would be eliminated, the risk of double taxation or abusive double non-taxation seems limited within the group. However, the method to avoid double taxation would also be relevant for transactions with for example associated non-group entities.
In recent years, the credit method seems to have gained popularity at the OECD level. The reason for this is the aim to avoid double non-taxation. For example, the MLI contains three options for states to deal with the elimination of double taxation, which are essentially aimed at making sure no double non-taxation can exist.1 All options included in the MLI entail either a partial or full switch to the credit method. From the Pillar Two developments it also follows that the OECD sees the application of the credit method as a manner to combat tax avoidance.2 The Pillar One Blueprint does not seem to contain a preference for either method.3 As countries have their own policy goals, it is left up to the various countries to choose which of the two methods they prefer.4
As indicated in par. 6.2.3.5, some amendments to the articles on the elimination of double taxation would be required to specifically deal with dividends received from an associated non-unitary business entity, interest and royalties received by the unitary business from a third party or a non-unitary business entity, and interest paid by the unitary business to a third party or an associated non-unitary business entity.