State aid to banks
Einde inhoudsopgave
State aid to banks (IVOR nr. 109) 2018/12.3.3.1:12.3.3.1 Limited possibilities for burden-sharing
State aid to banks (IVOR nr. 109) 2018/12.3.3.1
12.3.3.1 Limited possibilities for burden-sharing
Documentgegevens:
mr. drs. R.E. van Lambalgen, datum 01-12-2017
- Datum
01-12-2017
- Auteur
mr. drs. R.E. van Lambalgen
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS590594:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Europees financieel recht
Mededingingsrecht / EU-mededingingsrecht
Deze functie is alleen te gebruiken als je bent ingelogd.
Sometimes, the possibilities for burden-sharing are limited. This can be the case if there are just no subsidiaries to divest, or if divesting those subsidiaries would endanger the bank’s viability. An example of the first situation can be found in the case of the (Cypriot) Cooperative Central Bank (CCB):
“Since the CCIs do not engage in international businesses and do not carry out sizable non-banking activities, there was no option for more divestments outside core Cypriot banking operations”.1
Other examples of a limited possibility to downsize are the cases of ATE, T Bank and Commerzbank. In the decision on T Bank, the Commission noted that T Bank was a very small bank: “It owned no stand-alone subsidiaries or business of sufficient size to be sold separately to contribute to the cost of the restructuring”.2 Similarly, in the decision on the Greek bank ATE, the Commission considered that “in view of the fact that ATE is mainly a retail bank that has no large bond portfolios to reduce but a medium-sized balance sheet consisting mainly of loans, the present downsizing is significant”.3 In the decision on Commerzbank, the Commission noted that “Commerzbank is not in a position to sell off further assets to reinforce its capital base in the short term without jeopardising its survival in the long term”.4