Einde inhoudsopgave
The Decoupling of Voting and Economic Ownership (IVOR nr. 88) 2012/5.2.2.1
5.2.2.1 The Transparency Directive
mr. M.C. Schouten, datum 01-06-2012
- Datum
01-06-2012
- Auteur
mr. M.C. Schouten
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS599423:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Ondernemingsrecht / Rechtspersonenrecht
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
Directive 2004/109/EC, On the Harmonisation of Transparency Requirements in Relation to Information About Issuers Whose Securities are Admitted to Trading on a Regulated Market, 1, 2004 O.J. (L 390) 38 [hereinafter Transparency Directive].
Id. 22, art. 13.
See Luca Enriques & Matteo Gatti, Is There a Uniform EU Securities Law After the Financial Services Action Plan? 14 Stan. J.L. Bus. & Fin. 43 (2008) (discussing the Transparency Directive and focusing on issuer disclosure obligations); Michael C. Schouten, The Case for Mandatory Ownership Disclosure, Stan. J. L. Bus. & Fin. (forthcoming 2009) (discussing the Transparency Directive and focusing on shareholder disclosure obligations).
The aim of the Transparency Directive is to promote efficient, transparent, and integrated European securities markets.1 The Directive, adopted in 2004, reiterates the principle of equal treatment of shareholders and it therefore encourages active involvement of foreign shareholders through timely disclosure of information concerning shareholder meetings and through proxy voting.2 Facilitating cross-border voting, however, is clearly not the primary concern of the Directive. In fact, the bulk of the provisions of the directive seek to harmonize periodic disclosure obligations of issuers and ad hoc disclosure obligations of shareholders.3 The issue of cross-border voting has only been addressed head-on with the adoption of the Shareholders' Rights Directive.