EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation: from ISD to MiFID II
Einde inhoudsopgave
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/5.IV:5.IV Investment firms and client limit orders in shares
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/5.IV
5.IV Investment firms and client limit orders in shares
Documentgegevens:
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás, datum 01-02-2021
- Datum
01-02-2021
- Auteur
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS266984:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Bank- en effectenrecht
Financieel recht / Europees financieel recht
Financiële dienstverlening / Financieel toezicht
Toon alle voetnoten
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
The pre-trade transparency rule also applies to (systematic) internalisers. Internalisers, whether incidental or systematic, execute client orders (while trading on own account). Where a (systematic) internaliser receives a limit order from a client, the rule can apply where the MiFID II conditions are met.
Deze functie is alleen te gebruiken als je bent ingelogd.
The foregoing paragraphs examined the equity pre-trade transparency rules for RMs, MTFs, and SIs. This paragraph focuses upon a MiFID II pre-trade transparency requirement for investment firms operating outside RMs and MTFs (including SIs) in relation to limit orders of clients.1 Similar to MiFID I, MiFID II requires investment firms to immediately publish unexecuted client limit orders2 where certain conditions are met.3MiFID II expands the scope of the requirement from (a) shares admitted to trading on an RM (MiFID I situation) to (b) shares admitted to trading on an RM or traded on an RM or MTF (hereafter: ‘shares’). Under MiFID II other equity instruments than shares, namely depositary receipts, ETFs, certificates, and other similar financial instruments, fall outside the scope of the requirement.4 The so-called MiFID II ‘client limit order display rule’ is examined below.
5.IV.1 Disclosure of client limit orders5.IV.2 Concluding remarks