Einde inhoudsopgave
Sustainability Reporting in capital markets: A Black Box? (ZIFO nr. 30) 2019/4.1.2.1
4.1.2.1 The “Statement of Significant Audiences and Materiality” and the “Sustainable Value Matrix tool”
A. Duarte Correia, datum 20-11-2019
- Datum
20-11-2019
- Auteur
A. Duarte Correia
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS169161:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Bank- en effectenrecht
Ondernemingsrecht / Jaarrekeningenrecht
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
Those who manage other people’s money must act responsibly in the interests of the beneficiaries, rather than acting in their own interests. Fiduciaries have the duty of being loyal to the beneficiary and have the duty of acting with due care, and as an “ordinary prudent man” (PRI, Responsible investment and fiduciary duty, 2015).
See, Robert G. Eccles and Tim Youmans , “Why Boards Must Look Beyond Shareholders”, Big Idea: Sustainability Blog, September 03, 2015, Available at: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/why-boards-must-look-beyond-shareholders/.
See, Robert G. Eccles and Tim Youmans , “Why Boards Must Look Beyond Shareholders”, Big Idea: Sustainability Blog, September 03, 2015, Available at: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/why-boards-must-look-beyond-shareholders/.
Materiality in Corporate Governance: The Statement of Significant Audiences and Materiality September 3, 2015 By Robert G. Eccles and Tim Youmans, Harvard Business School https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/16-023_f29dce5d-cbac-4840-8d5f-32b21e6f644e.pdf.
Prof. Robert G. Eccles and Tim Youmans of Harvard Business School led a collaboration of The UN Global Compact, the American Bar Association’s Task Force on Sustainable Development and Linklaters, to gather legal perspectives from leading global law firms about the fiduciary duty of the board of directors. Robert G. Eccles and Tim Youmans are researching the possibility of developing a global, country‐by‐country legal framework that allows directors to consider the universe of stakeholders in their materiality determination process. Their research has found that in some jurisdictions, as the United States, directors have equally a duty to the corporation and a duty to shareholders, what is called “primacy duality”. Moreover, they have found that in no jurisdiction is a duty to shareholders a higher duty than to the corporate person. For example, in Brazil, stakeholders other than shareholders, such as employees and NGOs are already part of the current legal definition of the corporate person; also in the UK and China duties to society should be considered. See, Materiality in Corporate Governance: The Statement of Significant Audiences and Materiality September 3, 2015 By Robert G. Eccles and Tim Youmans, Harvard Business School https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/16-023_f29dce5d-cbac-4840-8d5f-32b21e6f644e.pdf See also, https://www.economistinsights.com/business-strategy/opinion/and-corporate-directors-report.
See, Materiality in Corporate Governance: The Statement of Significant Audiences and Materiality September 3, 2015 By Robert G. Eccles and Tim Youmans, Harvard Business School https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/16-023_f29dce5d-cbac-4840-8d5f-32b21e6f644e.pdf See also, https://www.economistinsights.com/business-strategy/opinion/and-corporate-directors-report.
See, Robert Eccles, Why It’s Time For Boards To Take A Stand On Sustainability, March 30, 2016 Forbeshttps://www.forbes.com/sites/bobeccles/2016/03/30/why-its-time-for-boards-to-take-a-stand-on-sustainability/#2a4858e61a65 The legal memos are available at: https://www.americanbar.org/groups/leadership/office_of_the_president/sustainable_development_task_force.html.
Robert Eccles, Why It’s Time For Boards To Take A Stand On Sustainability, March 30, 2016 Forbeshttps://www.forbes.com/sites/bobeccles/2016/03/30/why-its-time-for-boards-to-take-a-stand-on-sustainability/#2a4858e61a65.
According to E&Y, these numbers have increased from 36% in 2014 to 80% in 2015.
The Swedish company Atlas Copco was one of the first companies in the world to publish a statement of significant audiences and a “Materiality Mapping Results” diagram showing the ESG issues it is facing and how the company is tackling them in its 2015 integrated report. See, https://www.atlascopcogroup.com/content/dam/atlas-copco/documents/Corporate/investors/financial-publications/english/20160310%20Annual%20report%20incl.%20sustainability%20report%20and% 20corporate%20governance%20report%202015.pdf. Also the Dutch insurance company Aegon is amongst the first companies to publish a matrix of stakeholders in its 2014 Review. See, https://www.aegon.com/Documents/aegon-com/Sitewide/Reports-and-Other-Publications/Annual-reviews/2014/Aegon-2014-Review-EN.pdf.
Stakeholders other than shareholders are not necessarily ignored, as materiality is constantly changing, however, priorities must be set according to the company’s strategy. See, Why It’s Time For Boards To Take A Stand On Sustainability, March 30, 2016 Forbes.
Why It’s Time For Boards To Take A Stand On Sustainability, March 30, 2016 Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/bobeccles/2016/03/30/why-its-time-for-boards-to-take-a-stand-on-sustainability/#2a4858e61a65.
See, Robert G. Eccles and Tim Youmans , “Why Boards Must Look Beyond Shareholders”, Big Idea: Sustainability Blog, September 03, 2015, Available at: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/why-boards-must-lookbeyond-shareholders/.
As an introductory note to this point, I do not intend to go into the topic of the “social responsibilities of businesses” and the extensively debated shareholder versus stakeholder primacy. However, the research conducted by Harvard’s professors Robert Eccles and Tim Youmans have brought a new light into the stakeholder’s view, showing that this view may favor sustainability. As explained below, the further development of a sustainability reporting framework may be a subject to consider.
Friedman’s shareholder’s primacy has been the single corporate material focus and responsible for inhibiting the inclusion of other stakeholders’ interests in a company’s strategy and reporting. The boards of directors have long believed in the idea that their fiduciary duty was primarily to the company’s shareholders.1 This is purely an ideology and not a legal requirement.2In result, boards of directors have been primarily focused on the short-term financial results of the company. The generation of financial profit is not the main objective of the corporation but solely an outcome of the corporation’s activities.3 This idea has been replaced and recent research has shown that the corporation has the objective to survive and when possible to thrive and not to increase shareholder value only.4 As explained below in section 2 of this chapter, the IIRC has identified six capitals, the financial, manufactured, intellectual, human, social and relationship, and natural capital. Each of these capitals has different audiences who have their interests in each of the capitals. Recent research looked at varied jurisdictions and found out that with no exception, the board of directors has a primary duty to the corporation itself as a separate legal person, and not to the shareholders only.5
Leading law firms in all the G20 countries together with 14 other countries have published legal memos clarifying that the primary duty of the board is to the long- term interests of the corporation as a separate legal entity and there are no legal obstacles for the board to identify significant audiences that go beyond shareholders.6 Legally it is actually in the interest of the directors to consider other significant audiences if the board believes these audiences will affect the company’s long-term ability to survive and prosper.7 Once responsible for the management of the company’s assets, the board of directors need to determine which issues are relevant to the company’s strategy, in other words which issues are material to the long-term viability of the business. Fiduciary duty has been understood by directors has the duty of putting the interests of shareholders and the corporation first (American Bar Association, 2015).8 The misperception of shareholder primacy as a legal requirement, has led directors to concentrate on the interests of the shareholders and consequently underestimating the interests of other stakeholders. Materiality should ultimately be decided by the board of directors, as it is sector specific and based on judgment.9 In the Ernst & Young’s survey “Global Institutional investor survey 2015 – Investment rules 2.0: nonfinancial and ESG reporting trends”, mandatory board oversight of sustainability reporting was considered essential or important by 80% of the surveyed.10 Materiality is not a static concept and it changes with the evolving needs of the reasonable investor and how investors need to understand how a company is positioned (Jean Rogers, SASB’s CEO).11
Harvard Professor Robert Eccles’ research has suggested a step to improve the misperception of the board of directors’ fiduciary duty, by yearly publishing a one- page “Statement of Significant Audiences and Materiality” and a Sustainable Value Matrix tool that translates the statement into management decisions.12 In this one- page length statement the board of directors communicates whether sustainability is important for the company, which are the significant audiences (other stakeholders) beyond the shareholders and expected time frame.13 This document is the basis for developing a long term sustainable strategy and to show how the company is contributing to society.14 By concentrating their focus only on their significant audiences, companies have better financial performance than those who don’t have this governance focus (Harvard Business School Professor George Serafeim).15 The boards of directors of listed companies are called to publish an annual Statement of Significant Audiences and Materiality by 2025.16