Einde inhoudsopgave
The EU VAT Treatment of Vouchers (FM nr. 157) 2019/6.4
6.4 Exceptions to the main rule: consumption without adjustment(?)
Dr. J.B.O. Bijl, datum 01-05-2019
- Datum
01-05-2019
- Auteur
Dr. J.B.O. Bijl
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS595938:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Omzetbelasting / Levering van goederen en diensten
Omzetbelasting / Bijzondere OB-regelingen
Omzetbelasting / Vergoeding
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
CJEU case C-285/95, Julius Fillibeck Söhne GmbH&Co. KG and Finanzamt Neustadt, ECLI:EU:C:1997:491, paragraph 30.
CJEU case C-371/07, Danfoss A/S and AstraZeneca A/S v Skatteministeriet, ECLI:EU:C:2008:711, paragraph 62.
Proposal for a second Directive for the harmonization among Member States of turnover tax legislation, concerning the form and methods of application of the common system of taxation on value added, COM (65) 144 final, 13 April 1965, Supplement to the Bulletin of the European Economic Community No. 5, 1965, p. 32: “Withdrawals for publicity gifts of small value and for samples, which may be imputed to overhead costs for fiscal purposes, should not be treated as taxable deliveries.”
See, for example, CJEU Case C-285/95, Julius Fillibeck Söhne GmbH&Co. KG and Finanzamt Neustadt, ECLI:EU:C:1997:491, par. 30 and Case C-371/07, Danfoss A/S and AstraZeneca A/S v Skatteministeriet, ECLI:EU:C:2008:711, par. 60-63.
CJEU case C-48/97, Kuwait Petroleum (GB) Ltd and Commissioners of Customs & Excise, ECLI:EU:C:1999:203, par. 22 and 23.
CJEU case C-285/95, Julius Fillibeck Söhne GmbH&Co. KG and Finanzamt Neustadt, ECLI:EU:C:1997:491, par. 30.
CJEU case C-371/07, Danfoss A/S and AstraZeneca A/S v Skatteministeriet, ECLI:EU:C:2008:711, par. 62.
Before I investigate whether the relevant provisions in the EU VAT Directive that deal with the VAT treatment of transactions that are subject to VAT also apply to supplies that are deemed to be made for consideration, I will examine the exceptions to the rules that require taxation of these supplies. In some cases, where the personal benefit derived from a free supply is of only secondary importance compared to the needs of the business1 or merely accessory to the requirements of the business,2 the supplies should not be taxed, even though there is an element of private consumption.
From the beginning, it was clear that certain free supplies should not be taxed, even though these would lead to (a certain degree of (private)) consumption. This has been codified for the supply of free gifts and samples3 and is based on CJEU case law for other supplies that are free of charge and that are not considered to be made for purposes other than those of the business, even though some degree of (private) consumption takes place.4
According to the CJEU, the fact that there is a valid business reason for making free supplies is not sufficient to avoid taxation.5 This means that there is a difference in VAT treatment of goods and services provided free of charge for business purposes where an element of consumption is still acknowledged and supplies goods and services for no consideration where the personal benefit that is a result of that supply is considered of only secondary importance compared to the needs of the business6 or merely accessory to the requirements of the business.7 The first type of supply is taxed, the second type is not.
6.4.1 The element of private consumption can be so small, compared to the business reasons for making the free supply, that no adjustment needs to be made6.4.2 No taxation of the free supply of samples and of gifts of small value6.4.3 What is a ‘sample’6.4.4 What is a ‘gift of small value’6.4.5 VAT treatment of free services that are samples or of small value