EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation: from ISD to MiFID II
Einde inhoudsopgave
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/4.II.1.1:4.II.1.1 Goal
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/4.II.1.1
4.II.1.1 Goal
Documentgegevens:
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás, datum 01-02-2021
- Datum
01-02-2021
- Auteur
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS266412:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Bank- en effectenrecht
Financieel recht / Europees financieel recht
Financiële dienstverlening / Financieel toezicht
Toon alle voetnoten
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
Recital 5 MiFID I Implementing Regulation.
Reference is made to recital 44 MiFID I Directive and CESR, Consultation Paper: Technical Advice to the European Commission in the Context of the MiFID Review – Equity Markets, April 2010(CESR/10-394)(hereafter: CESR, MiFID I Equity Review, April 2010(CESR/10-394)), p. 5.
Deze functie is alleen te gebruiken als je bent ingelogd.
MiFID I subjected RMs and MTFs to a pre-trade transparency regime for shares admitted to trading on an RM. The rationale behind the pre-trade transparency obligations was to achieve a high degree of transparency. The high degree of transparency was to ensure investors were adequately informed as to the true level of potential transactions in such shares. Another motivation behind the aim for a high degree of transparency was also to ensure that the price discovery of such shares would not be impaired by the fragmentation of liquidity and investors were thereby not penalised.1 The MiFID I pre-trade transparency obligations were also in place to enable investment firms to achieve best execution, in particular in the more competitive – and therewith potentially more fragmented – market of MiFID I.2