State aid to banks
Einde inhoudsopgave
State aid to banks (IVOR nr. 109) 2018/11.8.2:11.8.2 Has the Commission consistently taken into account this relevant characteristic?
State aid to banks (IVOR nr. 109) 2018/11.8.2
11.8.2 Has the Commission consistently taken into account this relevant characteristic?
Documentgegevens:
mr. drs. R.E. van Lambalgen, datum 01-12-2017
- Datum
01-12-2017
- Auteur
mr. drs. R.E. van Lambalgen
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS585877:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Europees financieel recht
Mededingingsrecht / EU-mededingingsrecht
Deze functie is alleen te gebruiken als je bent ingelogd.
At the outset, it should be noted that only in the C-context, it is necessary to explicitly point out that the bank will focus on its core activities and terminate its non-core activities. In other contexts, the focus on the core activities or the termination of the non-core activities is already implied. Indeed, in the W-context, all activities are categorised as non-core (and subsequently terminated), while in the S-context, the bank is split-up into a good bank (which comprises the core activities) and a bad bank (which comprises the non-core activities).
Thus, the current relevant characteristic is only relevant in the C-context. As can be seen in the table in Annex XII, most cases in the C-context are characterised by a focus on the core activities.