EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation: from ISD to MiFID II
Einde inhoudsopgave
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/17.III.3.4:17.III.3.4 Unbundled from other services
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/17.III.3.4
17.III.3.4 Unbundled from other services
Documentgegevens:
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás, datum 01-02-2021
- Datum
01-02-2021
- Auteur
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS267308:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Bank- en effectenrecht
Financieel recht / Europees financieel recht
Financiële dienstverlening / Financieel toezicht
Toon alle voetnoten
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
CESR, Publication and Consolidation of MiFID Market Transparency Data, February 2007 (07-043), p. 10.
Reference is made to ESMA, Final Report: MiFID II/MiFIR, December 2014 (ESMA/2014/1569), p. 277.
Deze functie is alleen te gebruiken als je bent ingelogd.
MiFID II also aims to reduce costs by requiring MiFID II Data Suppliers (RMs, MTFs, SIs, APAs, and CTPs) to make MiFID II market data available without being bundled with other services.1 CESR already provided similar guidance under MiFID I. CESR considered that RMs, MTFs, and investment firms could not make the supply of MiFID I pre- and post-trade data conditional on the purchase of other bundled services.2MiFID II transforms CESR’s guideline into formal law. The aim of the MiFID II-rule is to make it possible to acquire and pay for market data services without having to acquire other services that may not be wanted.3 The MiFID II-rules for the unbundling of market data and other services, complement the MiFID II-requirement to disaggregate pre- and post-trade data from each other (see paragraphs above).