Einde inhoudsopgave
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/4.V.1.2.2
4.V.1.2.2 CESR guidance of 2010
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás, datum 01-02-2021
- Datum
01-02-2021
- Auteur
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS266800:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Bank- en effectenrecht
Financieel recht / Europees financieel recht
Financiële dienstverlening / Financieel toezicht
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
Despite some additions to the original CESR guidance, the CESR guidance on the responsible NCA and calculation/estimation methodology remained largely the same (CESR, Protocol on the Operation of CESR MiFID Database, December 2010 (CESR/09-172d)).
CESR, Protocol on the Operation of CESR MiFID Database, December 2010 (CESR/09-172d), p. 5.
CESR, Protocol on the Operation of CESR MiFID Database, December 2010 (CESR/09-172d), p. 5-7. According to the existing data at the time, the most relevant MTFs in terms of overall market share (not ranked) were BATS, Chi-X, Turquoise, NYSE Arca, Burgundy, Smartpool and Liquidnet (ibid).
In the second stage, CESR improved and complemented the initial CESR guidance. The main changes concerned the data required for the calculations.1 A main challenge identified were technical problems with the use of transaction reporting data for the calculations. The intended use of transaction reporting data turned out to be less straightforward than anticipated. CESR amended the internal guidebook to improve as much as possible to the calculations to be made available to the market, given the technical limitations.2 CESR also made changes as to data collection from RMs. As noted, NCAs originally used mainly the data from the RM that was the most relevant market in terms of liquidity. CESR decided that, in addition to the most relevant RM in terms of liquidity, the data from the seven most relevant MTFs in terms of overall market share also needed to be included in the calculations.3