Public funding of failing banks in the European Union
Einde inhoudsopgave
Public funding of failing banks in the European Union (LBF vol. 19) 2020/7.4.2.3:7.4.2.3 Deviations from burden-sharing cascade
Public funding of failing banks in the European Union (LBF vol. 19) 2020/7.4.2.3
7.4.2.3 Deviations from burden-sharing cascade
Documentgegevens:
mr. M. Louisse-Read, datum 01-06-2020
- Datum
01-06-2020
- Auteur
mr. M. Louisse-Read
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS213702:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Europees financieel recht
Staatssteun (V)
Toon alle voetnoten
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
Article 44(2) BRRD. Article 27(3) SRMR. See also section 4.5.3.4. It is at this point that the BRRD may interfere with the hierarchy in normal insolvency proceedings. See Ramos Muñoz 2017, p. 265-266.
Article 109(1) BRRD. Article 79(1) SRMR. Article 109(5), last paragraph BRRD. Article 79(5) SRMR. See also section 4.5.3.4.
Article 44(3) BRRD. Article 27(5) SRMR.
See also section 4.5.5.
Deze functie is alleen te gebruiken als je bent ingelogd.
The resolution framework does not provide for an exception to the burden-sharing requirement, if applying this requirement endangers financial stability or leads to disproportionate results. It does however provide that certain eligible liabilities are excluded from the scope of the bail-in tool, including covered deposits, but, e.g. also operational liabilities.1
The deposit guarantee schemes contribute to the resolution for the amount of covered deposits that would have been in scope of the bail-in tool, if these were not excluded.2
In addition, in exceptional circumstances the resolution authorities may (partially) exclude other liabilities where certain conditions are met.3 Lastly, the NCWO principle applies when the bail-in tool is used. As a result, creditors may not incur greater losses than they would have incurred in an insolvency situation.4