Einde inhoudsopgave
Corporate Social Responsibility (IVOR nr. 77) 2010/12.1.4
12.1.4 Research method
Mr. T.E. Lambooy, datum 17-11-2010
- Datum
17-11-2010
- Auteur
Mr. T.E. Lambooy
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS365810:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Ondernemingsrecht (V)
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
The selection criteria for the ESG Agencies were: (1) their impact (the number of clients, or whether they provide information for stock exchange sustainability indices) focusing on players that have an impact; (2) biodiversity the frontrunners concerning the theme of biodiversity were selected; and (3) their background diversification in their geographic location and basic approach ('ethical versus financial approach', also referred to as 'values versus value approach'). The selection criteria for the financials were: (1) their impact (their size, global coverage and the amount of assets under management) - focusing on the mainstream financial institutions rather than niche institutions; (2) their attitude towards sustainability issues at large their cooperative attitude; (3) biodiversity awareness of biodiversity-related issues; (4) the type of organisation - their coverage of different parts of the field. The selection criteria for NGOs were: whether they were working with private and financial sector partners to attain biodiversity enhancement goals (based on the track records of cooperation projects, research capacity, participation in networks).
The study employed traditional research methods such as desk study and interviews, combined with action research to gain insights into the dynamics between different stakeholder groups. Action research comprises a broad array of different methods, used in various settings and with different aims. In section 12.3.1 the concepts on which this research project was based will be explained in more detail. The research project consisted of three stages.
Stage 1 - Assessment of the current state of the market
The project commenced with an assessment of the current state of the
information market on BES and of its potential for growth. This was conducted
through:
desk research. The desk research phase was scheduled from December 2008 to May 2009. The policies and the products of 27 ESG Agencies and 18 financial institutions were examined. In addition, documents and websites regarding business and biodiversity theories were studied. The desk research served three aims: (1) to gain an insight into the market; (2) to select the interviewes1; and (3) to develop formats for the interviews; and
in-depth interviews. Between February 2009 and May 2009, a total of 18 semi-structured interviews were conducted with representatives of ESG Agencies (n=8), NGOs (n=3) and asset management companies (n=6). In addition, VBDO (the Dutch Association of Investors for Sustainable Development) was interviewed. Generally, the interviews commenced with questions on the 'everyday reality' and working procedures of the interviewee. The second part focused specifically on biodiversity-related services and the possibilities to integrate these in the work flow. Ideas and suggestions communicated during interviews became part of the discussions in the subsequent interviews.
Important questions guiding the research in the stages (i) and (ii) were: what information on corporate links with biodiversity and related concepts is currently available? How is the information gathered and verified? In what way is the information assessed and used by ESG Agencies? After processing, how is it incorporated in the products that they sell to institutional investors? Is there a mismatch between the information offered by ESG Agencies and that requested by institutional investors? If so, what are the underlying causes? The potential for growth was assessed by posing questions such as: what are the main themes and strategic priorities of ESG Agencies and institutional investors? What is the level of awareness of biodiversity and related concepts? Do any demands exist that are not met? Which initiatives concerning information on BES for investors are currently 'in progress'? What are the opportunities and obstacles in realisation of these initiatives? Which requirements should new tools and services meet? What would be the best approach to realise the creation of BES information services? And: which barriers are expected to obstruct the realisation thereof?
Stage 2 - Identification ofbarriers
As indicated, the first research goal was to find out whether the lack of BES information products was the consequence of barriers that could be remedied. This question was addressed in the second stage of the project through:
an analysis ofthe data collected during phases (i) and (ii). Throughout the research project, regular project-team meetings were held to compare and discuss the findings. In addition to the interviewees, other financial sector experts, conservation NGO representatives, ESG Agencies and the financier of the project, i.e. the Dutch Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, were consulted. In the analysis, certain characteristics of the BES information market were identified, also referred to as 'barriers' which explain why the market is not functioning at its full potential. Applying an integral research perspective to the market and the actors, cause-and-effect relationships between the actors and the interrelationships between certain market characteristics could be discerned; and
the formulation of suggestions for improvement of the market. Since the integral analysis demonstrated that the market barriers and opportunities were interrelated, it was estimated that only collaborative action by the stakeholders could cause a further development of the market. A few suggestions based on this finding were defined.
Stage 3 - To catalyse the market
In the last stage, the second research goal (section 12.1.3.) was pursued, i.e. to initiate change together with the stakeholders. The goal was to catalyse the market for BES information products in order to enable investors to include BES considerations in their investment decisions. The research method comprised of action research techniques:
a workshop was organised for stakeholders to generate ideas, assess the potential for collaborative action and test concrete suggestions thereto, as developed in phase (iv); and
evaluation. The project was evaluated with each of the workshop participants approximately half a year after the workshop in order to gain insights into the level of actions undertaken by the participants.
The final research report was presented to the Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment in February 2010, and in addition thereto was made available to all interviewees and workshop participants.