Einde inhoudsopgave
Public funding of failing banks in the European Union (LBF vol. 19) 2020/2.4.2
2.4.2 Pillar 1 requirements
mr. M. Louisse-Read, datum 01-06-2020
- Datum
01-06-2020
- Auteur
mr. M. Louisse-Read
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS213940:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Europees financieel recht
Staatssteun (V)
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
Gleeson 2018, p. 61-77.
Article 25 CRR.
Article 92 CRR.
Joosen 2015, p. 190.
Delivorias 2016, p. 3.
Delivorias 2016, p. 3.
As further discussed in section 4.5.2.
CRR II, amendments to Article 52(1) points (p) and (q) and Article 63 points (n) and (o) CRR. This will not change the status of capital instruments issued by EU institutions, because this is already the consequence of Article 59 BRRD. It does however ensure that only instruments issued by third-country subsidiaries of EU institutions that meet this additional requirement can be considered as Additional Tier 1 or as Tier 2 instruments by their EU parent entities when they calculate consolidated own funds requirements.
The Pillar 1 requirements contain the minimum capital requirements for banks.1 These minimum capital requirements relate to the Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital (together: the Total Capital) that a bank has to maintain. The Tier 1 capital of a bank consists of the sum of Common Equity Tier (CET) 1 capital and Additional Tier (AT) 1 capital.2 At all times, banks have to satisfy the following regulatory capital requirements expressed as a percentage of the TREA:3
CET 1 Capital Ratio of 4.5%;
Tier 1 Capital Ratio of 6%; and
Total Capital Ratio of 8%.
According to Joosen, the subordinated nature of claims exercisable by holders of CET 1, AT 1 and Tier 2 capital is the most important and central criterion outlined in the regulations of this subject matter. This subordination is layered, since CET 1 capital is more subordinated than AT 1 capital and Tier 2 capital is less subordinated than AT 1 capital.4 CET 1 capital is the primary source of loss absorption and thus the most expensive form of regulatory capital to be attracted by banks.5 AT 1 capital is considered going-concern capital, as a result of the conditions in relation to the minimum trigger event, as further discussed in section 2.4.2.2.6 Tier 2 capital should be seen as ‘gone concern’ capital, because it is only available when the bank is wound up in normal insolvency proceedings or liquidated.
CRR II introduces a change in the definition of AT 1 and Tier 2 capital as a result of which the law or contractual provisions governing AT 1 and Tier 2 instruments should require that, upon a decision by the resolution authority to exercise the write down and conversion powers referred to in Article 59 of the BRRD (the so-called PONV conversion power)7, the principal amount of the instruments is to be written down on a permanent basis or the instruments are to be converted to CET 1 instruments.8
2.4.2.1 CET 1 capital2.4.2.2 AT 1 capital2.4.2.3 Tier 2 capital