EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation: from ISD to MiFID II
Einde inhoudsopgave
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/13.III.1.2.3:13.III.1.2.3 Formats
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/13.III.1.2.3
13.III.1.2.3 Formats
Documentgegevens:
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás, datum 01-02-2021
- Datum
01-02-2021
- Auteur
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS267124:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Bank- en effectenrecht
Financieel recht / Europees financieel recht
Financiële dienstverlening / Financieel toezicht
Deze functie is alleen te gebruiken als je bent ingelogd.
Another key difference between the MiFID I and MiFID II framework is the harmonization of equity post-trade data formats. MiFID II requires APAs to publish the equity post-trade information in accordance with the International Standards Organisation-format (ISO-format). The aim of the harmonized format is to facilitate comparison, and consolidation of post-trade data.1 Formats were not harmonized under MiFID I, although CESR recommended (not: mandated) the use of common ISO-formats in CESR guidelines.2