EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation: from ISD to MiFID II
Einde inhoudsopgave
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/5.VI.2.3.1:5.VI.2.3.1 Reporting parties: RMs, MTFs, CTPs, and NCAs
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/5.VI.2.3.1
5.VI.2.3.1 Reporting parties: RMs, MTFs, CTPs, and NCAs
Documentgegevens:
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás, datum 01-02-2021
- Datum
01-02-2021
- Auteur
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS267024:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Bank- en effectenrecht
Financieel recht / Europees financieel recht
Financiële dienstverlening / Financieel toezicht
Toon alle voetnoten
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
Art. 7 MiFIR Delegated Regulation 2017/577.
Recital 39 and art. 28 ESMA Regulation 2010 and ESMA, Reporting Instructions: Double Volume Cap System, 22 October 2018(ESMA65-11-1198), p. 9.
Deze functie is alleen te gebruiken als je bent ingelogd.
MiFID II has provisions to ensure data for the double volume cap calculations is available. A main difference with the main MiFID II calculations and estimates is that for the purposes of the double volume cap RMs, MTFs, and CTPs need to report the data (not: RMs, MTFs, APAs, and CTPs).1 APAs are excluded from the scope, since APAs are only required to publish post-trade data from investment firms operating outside RMs and MTFs (i.e. data unrelated to the RM/MTF waivers).2 RMs, MTFs, and CTPs are required to send the data for the double volume cap mechanism to the responsible NCA (or ESMA in case of delegation).3NCAs are in turn a reporting party, because NCAs need to send the data received from RMs, MTFs, and CTPs to ESMA4 (unless data collection is already delegated to ESMA).5 The reason here is that ESMA (not: the NCA) performs the double volume cap calculations.6