EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation: from ISD to MiFID II
Einde inhoudsopgave
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/12.IV.2:12.IV.2 Level 2: specifying the publication and consolidation rules
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/12.IV.2
12.IV.2 Level 2: specifying the publication and consolidation rules
Documentgegevens:
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás, datum 01-02-2021
- Datum
01-02-2021
- Auteur
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS267298:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Bank- en effectenrecht
Financieel recht / Europees financieel recht
Financiële dienstverlening / Financieel toezicht
Toon alle voetnoten
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
CESR, Technical Advice on Possible Implementing Measures of MiFID I, April 2005 (CESR/05-290b), p. 54, p. 76 and 78. CESR also suggested, where applicable, to flag deferred trades (ibid).
The most notable examples were article 32 (conditions for dissemination arrangements) and article 27 (content and indications for particular post-trade reports) MiFID I Implementing Regulation.
Deze functie is alleen te gebruiken als je bent ingelogd.
MiFID I required the Commission to provide specifications on Level 2. CESR advised the Commission. CESR advised, among other things, on equity pre- and post-trade data content (for pre-trade only the content, not the reports) and on post-trade data flags, and timing requirements.1 The Commission adopted CESR’s recommendations, whilst adding currency to the content of the MiFID I post-trade reports. The CESR and Commission views are evident in the final MiFID I Implementing Regulation.2 Reflecting the Commission’s earlier unease in leaving publication and consolidation entirely up to the market, the MiFID I Implementing Regulation covered some preconditions for a reliable and accessible overview of EEA trading activity (e.g. flags for certain trades, such as negotiated trades).