Einde inhoudsopgave
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/5.V.1.2.5
5.V.1.2.5 The term ‘undertakes’
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás, datum 01-02-2021
- Datum
01-02-2021
- Auteur
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS266458:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Bank- en effectenrecht
Financieel recht / Europees financieel recht
Financiële dienstverlening / Financieel toezicht
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
ESMA, Q&A Trading Obligation for Shares, 13 November 2017 (available at: https://www.esma.europa.eu/press-news/esma-news/esma-clarifies-trading-obligation-shares-under-mifid-ii). ESMA gives the following example: where an EU investment firm (let’s say: investment firm A) transmits an order for a share admitted to trading on an RM or traded on a trading venue to an EU investment firm (let’s say: investment firm B) that subsequently passes it on to a non-EEA firm, the EU investment firms (investment firm A and investment firm B) need to ensure that the trade is undertaken on an RM, MTF, SI or equivalent third country trading venue (ibid).
Reference is made to ESMA, Q&A Trading Obligation for Shares, 13 November 2017. The view of ESMA is stricter than the initial perspective of certain market participants, noting that only the executing investment firm was subject to the share trading obligation (see AFME, Share Trading Obligation: Scope of the Obligation, 24 July 2017, p. 2).
MiFID II requires each investment firm to ensure the trades it ‘undertakes’ in shares admitted to trading on an RM or traded on a trading venue (hereafter: ‘shares’) to take place on regulated venues.1 ESMA provided guidance when an investment firm ‘undertakes’ a trade in shares. The guidance of ESMA focuses on the situation where there is a so-called ‘chain of order transmissions’. A ‘chain of order transmissions’ is where an investment firm (or multiple investment firms) transmit(s) orders to another or other investment firm(s) and at the end of the chain an investment firm actually executes the order. ESMA stated that where there is a chain of order transmissions in shares all EU investment firms that are part of the chain (either transmitting or executing the order) need to ensure that the ultimate execution of the orders complies with the trading obligation.2 Phrased differently, ESMA indicates that not only the investment firm that actually executes the order, but also the investment firm that transmits the order, is subject to the MiFID II share trading-obligation.3