The Importance of Board Independence - a Multidisciplinary Approach
Einde inhoudsopgave
The Importance of Board Independence (IVOR nr. 90) 2012/2.2:2.2 Board structures and board committees
The Importance of Board Independence (IVOR nr. 90) 2012/2.2
2.2 Board structures and board committees
Documentgegevens:
N.J.M. van Zijl, datum 05-10-2012
- Datum
05-10-2012
- Auteur
N.J.M. van Zijl
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS600601:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Ondernemingsrecht / Algemeen
Ondernemingsrecht / Corporate governance
Toon alle voetnoten
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
Part II describes the exact characteristics of the board structures in the three countries through the description of the legal frameworks.
Deze functie is alleen te gebruiken als je bent ingelogd.
Both unitary and dual board structures are observed in the countries of this study: the United Kingdom (unitary), the Netherlands (dual) and Sweden (mixed form).1 Unitary board structures are common in the Anglo-Saxon world, whereas dual board structures are more often applied in continental European countries. Since board independence within a unitary board structure cannot completely be compared with board independence in a dual board structure, this section elaborates both on structures and their differences. Therefore subsection 2.2.1 gives a description of both board structures; subsection 2.2.2 describes the differences and additionally focuses on the convergence that has been observed. Finally, subsection 2.2.3 elaborates on different board committees.
2.2.1 Unitary and dual board structures2.2.2 Board committees2.2.3 Convergence between unitary and dual board structures