EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation: from ISD to MiFID II
Einde inhoudsopgave
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/19.III.3:19.III.3 Technological innovation
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/19.III.3
19.III.3 Technological innovation
Documentgegevens:
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás, datum 01-02-2021
- Datum
01-02-2021
- Auteur
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS266747:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Bank- en effectenrecht
Financieel recht / Europees financieel recht
Financiële dienstverlening / Financieel toezicht
Deze functie is alleen te gebruiken als je bent ingelogd.
Besides market philosophies and market structures, the research shows that technological innovation has been a main factor that explains why EU equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation increased from ISD to MiFID II. From the ISD to MiFID II four main consequences of technological innovation have been: (1) the shift from phone/telephone to predominantly electronic markets; (2) new venues; (3) new trading possibilities; and (4) the increase in technological infrastructures (performing calculations and operating databases) in making the EU transparency rules work.
19.III.3.1 Shift from open outcry/telephone to electronic markets.19.III.3.2 New types of venues19.III.3.3 New trading techniques19.III.3.4 More calculations and databases