EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation: from ISD to MiFID II
Einde inhoudsopgave
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/17.IV.1:17.IV.1 General
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/17.IV.1
17.IV.1 General
Documentgegevens:
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás, datum 01-02-2021
- Datum
01-02-2021
- Auteur
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS267008:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Bank- en effectenrecht
Financieel recht / Europees financieel recht
Financiële dienstverlening / Financieel toezicht
Toon alle voetnoten
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
CESR, Technical Advice in the context of the MiFID Review, July 2010 (CESR/10-802); and Commission, Public Consultation: Review of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive, 8 December 2010, p. 32-33. For a different view, arguing that prices for market data were not too high, see Oxera, Pricing of market data services: An economic analysis, February 2014, under ii.
Deze functie is alleen te gebruiken als je bent ingelogd.
MiFID II obliges RMs, MTFs, APAs and CTPs (not: SIs) to make MiFID II market data available free of charge 15 minutes after publication.1 The MiFID II-rule can be seen as the final element to reduce data costs compared to MiFID I. The main aim of the rule is to reduce the costs of post-trade data, since these costs were overall (but not unanimously) considered to be too high under MiFID I.2 Compared to the other MiFID II-rules in this area, that is – (i) the obligation to disaggregate equity pre- and post-trade data; and (ii) the concept of a reasonable commercial basis, MiFID II provides no level 2-measures for making data free of charge 15 minutes after publication. The MiFID II-rules are therefore quite high level in nature. In order to provide uniformity and legal certainty, ESMA has provided several Q&As to clarify the concept. The MiFID II-text, as well as ESMA’s guidance, are examined below.