Einde inhoudsopgave
Sustainability Reporting in capital markets: A Black Box? (ZIFO nr. 30) 2019/6.3
6.3 Pension funds as responsible investors in Brazil
A. Duarte Correia, datum 20-11-2019
- Datum
20-11-2019
- Auteur
A. Duarte Correia
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS169196:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Bank- en effectenrecht
Ondernemingsrecht / Jaarrekeningenrecht
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
In 2015, Brazil had 207,8 million inhabitants and in 2016 Brazil’s unemployment rose to 10,9%, from 9% registered in 2015. See, Chapter 3, section 1.1.
See, http://www.abrapp.org.br/Documentos%20Pblicos/The%20Brazilian% 20Pension%20System.pdf.
See, http://www.abrapp.org.br/Documentos%20Pblicos/The%20Brazilian% 20Pension%20System.pdf.
52% of pension funds in Brazil considered ESG information disclosure by their fund manager, on how companies in their funds deal with ESG issues such as climate change, to be very helpful. See, “Greening Institutional Investment”, 2015, pp. 12. Available at: https://www.google.nl/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source= web&cd=10&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwio8_KmgL_QAhWrI8AKHXf- AMUQFghqMAk&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.unpri.org%2Fdownload_report% 2F22444&usg=AFQjCNE33ULvAUu3rl242ooRLfRlW7Tc MA&bvm=bv.139782543,d.ZGg.
See, Responsible Investment in Brazil 2016: ESG incorporation by pension funds., Sitawi (May 2016) cited by PRI at http://www.fiduciaryduty21.org/uploads/8/0/3/0/80301594/brazil_engagement_draft_final.pdf.
See, http://www.abrapp.org.br/Documentos%20Pblicos/The%20Brazilian% 20Pension%20System.pdf.
In Portuguese, Regime Geral de Previdência Social (RGPS).
See, http://www.abrapp.org.br/Documentos%20Pblicos/The%20Brazilian% 20Pension%20System.pdf.
See, http://www.abrapp.org.br/Documentos%20Pblicos/The%20Brazilian% 20Pension%20System.pdf.
See, http://www.abrapp.org.br/Documentos%20Pblicos/The%20Brazilian% 20Pension%20System.pdf.
See, http://www.abrapp.org.br/Documentos%20Pblicos/The%20Brazilian% 20Pension%20System.pdf.
The Superintendence of Private Insurance (Susep), linked to the Ministry of Finance, is responsible for the supervision of open private pension entities. See, http://www.uniabrapp.org.br/eng/uni_sistema.htm.
The text of the Resolution is available in Portuguese at: http://www.bcb.gov.br/pre/normativos/res/2009/pdf/res_3792_v3_P.pdf.
See, http://www.fiduciaryduty21.org/uploads/8/0/3/0/80301594/brazil_engagement_draft_final.pdf pp. 4. See also, in Portuguese, http://diario.abrapp.org.br/Paginas/Detalhes.aspx?nId=39634.
See, in Portuguese, http://diario.abrapp.org.br/Paginas/Detalhes.aspx?nId=39634.
See, in Portuguese, http://diario.abrapp.org.br/Paginas/Detalhes.aspx?nId=39634.
See, in English, pp. 20, https://www.editoraroncarati.com.br/v2/phocadownload/SBA_newsletter_may_2017.pdf and in Portuguese, http://www.fcopel.org.br/noticias/2017/6/13/previc-classifica-fundos-de-pensao-em-entidade-sistematicamente-importante-esi.
The text of PREVIC’s Instruction No. 005, of the 29th of May of 2017 is available at https://www.editoraroncarati.com.br/v2/phocadownload/SBA_newsletter_may_2017.pdf. “3) PREVIC INSTRUCTION No. 005, OF 05/29/2017. Provides for the framework of closed private pension entities as Systemically Important Entities (ESI) and provides other measures. This Instruction establishes criteria for the framework of Closed Supplementary Social Security Entities (EFPC) operating as Systemically Important Entities (ESI), for purposes of prudential supervision and regulatory proportionality. The classification criteria consider the size and relevance of the EFPC for the system from indicators of the volume of mathematical provision and classification as entities of public servants, created based on article 40, §§ 14 and 15 of the Federal Constitution. The list of ESI can be found in PREVIC Administrative Rule No. 580, of 5/29/2017.”
See, in Portuguese, http://www.bcb.gov.br/pre/normativos/res/2009/pdf/res_3792_v3_P.pdf.
For the summary of the Brazilian asset allocation limits, under CMN Resolution 3,792/2009, see, http://irlatam.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/docs/IRLATAM-presentaciones-2016/SITAWI-RI-Brazil-2016-EN-2016-09-12.pdf annex 6, pp. 32.
Russell Galer, “Prudent person rule standard for the investment of pension fund assets‟ (OECD, Financial Affairs Division of the Directorate of Financial, Fiscal and Corporate Affairs Global Forum) pp. 2 http://www.oecd.org/finance/private-pensions/2763540.pdf.
See, in Portuguese, http://www.bcb.gov.br/pre/normativos/res/2009/pdf/res_3792_v3_P.pdf
- Art. 4”
Na aplicação dos recursos dos planos, os administradores da EFPC devem:
- I -
observar os princípios de segurança, rentabilidade, solvência, liquidez e transparência;
- II -
exercer suas atividades com boa fé, lealdade e diligência;
- III -
zelar por elevados padries éticos; e
- IV -
adotar práticas que garantam o cumprimento do seu dever fiduciário em relação aos participantes dos planos de benefícios.
See, http://www.oecd.org/daf/fin/private-pensions/2015-Large-Pension-Funds-Survey.pdf (table 1 on pp. 8).
Finance For Good is a non-profit founded in 2008, managed by entrepreneurs with background in business, finance and sustainability, acquired in management consulting firms (McKinsey, Accenture), banks (BankBoston, ABN AMRO), NGOs (Ashoka, Friends of the Earth) and international MBAs (HBS, IE). See, http://irlatam. com/wp-content/uploads/2016/docs/IRLATAM-presentaciones-2016/SITAWI-RI- Brazil-2016-EN-2016-09-12.pdf pp. 2.
Information retrieved from an interview conducted on the 28 November of 2012, in São Paulo.
Yamahaki, Camila & Gaban, Cinthia S. “Responsible Investment in South America” pp. 89, 90, part of Chapter of the book “The Routledge Handbook of Responsible Investment”, edited by Tessa Hebb, James P. Hawley, Andreas G.F. Hoepner, Agnes L. Neher, David Wood, 2016.
Other pension funds engaged in ESG best practices in Brazil are Infraprev and Fundação Real Grandeza. See, in Portuguese, http://diario.abrapp.org.br/Paginas/Detalhes.aspx?nId=39634.
In 2004 the Ethos Institute together with ABRAPP developed 11 Basic Principles for Social Responsibility launched at the Annual Congress of Brazilian Pension Funds. See, in Portuguese, http://www.abrapp.org.br/Documentos% 20Pblicos/Responsabilidade_Social.pdf.
See, in Portuguese, http://www.abrapp.org.br/SitePages/RelatorioSocial2013.aspx.
See, in Portuguese, http://www.abrapp.org.br/Documentos%20Pblicos/rel2014.pdf.
See, in Portuguese, http://www.abrapp.org.br/Documentos%20Pblicos/Cartilha_GRI.pdf pp. 3.
The ANBIMA was created by the merger of ANBID - National Association of Investment Banks and ANDIMA - National Association of Financial Market Institutions, the two most important representatives of financial and capital markets players in Brazil. See, http://www.bestbrazil.org.br/media/ANBIMA.pdf pp. 2.
See, in Portuguese, http://portal.anbima.com.br/informacoes-tecnicas/estudos/ Sustentabilidade/Documents/_anbima_relatoriosustentabilidade_final.pdf pp. 3.
Brazilian pension funds, similarly to other pension funds globally, also face challenges such as rapid population’ growth and unemployment.1 Brazil has a young population. 62% of Brazilians are aged 29 or under. However, the birth rate is decreasing and it is estimated to fall further from 1.77 births per woman (lower than the US rate) to 1.5 births per woman in 2034 (ABRAPP, 2014).2 Life expectancy is also growing and it is estimated that, on average, the Brazilian population will live longer than 80 year by 2041. Therefore, an ageing population is also on the horizon (ABRAPP, 2014).3
Given the large income inequality (see Chapter 3) the Brazilian population relies mostly on the benefits provided by the social security system, in the first pillar. However, the number of high income earners is growing rapidly. The Brazilian Ministry of Social Security estimated this growth to continue until 2021, which will scale-up growth on the second pillar pensions as well.4
The Brazilian pension system is in the overall 16th position of the 2016 MMGPI.5 The Brazilian pension system is classified by the MMGPI as a C-grade system “A system that has some good features, but also has major risks and/or shortcomings that should be addressed. Without these improvements, its efficacy and/or long- term sustainability can be questioned.”6
Investors’ demand for ESG disclosure had a significant increase in 2014 and 2015. Reasons included environmental, social and political crisis, such as the water draught in São Paulo, the collapse of Samarco’s mine tailings dam, the Petrobras/ Lava Jato corruption scandals and former President Dilma Rousseff’s impeachment.7 This setting of environmental, social and political unrest triggered investor’s interest (client demand) about ESG disclosure and risk management but also regulatory change towards the encouragement of ESG best practices.89
Brazilian pension funds, especially the closed pension funds, are increasingly aware of ESG risks and integration. According to SITAWI’s research (2016) 94% of the top 50 pension funds (by net asset value) mention ESG in investment policies, an increase from 67% in 2014.10 Similarly to Sweden, the Netherlands and to the US, as there is no globally accepted guidance for ESG integration and implementation in investment processes, Brazilian pension funds are also learning by doing. The PRI highlights the potential role of key organizations in the Brazilian financial markets have in promoting ESG best practices. Organizations such as, the Brazilian Association for Closed Supplementary Social Security Entities (in Portuguese, “Associação Brasileira das Entidades Fechadas de Previdência Complementar” – ABRAPP) and the Brazilian Financial and Capital Markets Association (ANBIMA), and also industry associations.11
a) Regulatory framework
The Brazilian pension system is based on a three-pillar pension model. Since the nineties it has been subject to reforms to restructure an “overgenerous” pension system created after the end of the military rule in 1988.1213 The first pillar consists of a pay-as-you-go social security system.14 This system is called the General Social Security Regime. It is a public and mandatory system which provides for defined benefit pensions for private sector employed workers, self- employed professionals and elected civil servants.15 It is financed by the payroll taxes, which are shared by the employer and the employee, revenues from sales taxes and federal transfers.16 The second pillar consists of voluntary Pension Regimes for Government Workers for public-sector employees. These are generally financed on a pay-as-you-go basis by the employees’ contribution through the payment of a percentage of their salary.17 The third pillar consists of the voluntary Complementary Pension regime, also called private pension regime. It comprises voluntary occupational corporate and individual pension plans, which may be offered by employers (single or multi-employer basis), insurance companies, pension funds, labor unions and class associations. It has the objective of generating additional income to the beneficiary in the future.181920 Closed pension funds in Brazil are non-profit organizations set with the single purpose of financing retirement pension and related death and disability benefits.21
The occupational pension system is offered by two types of institutions, (1) the open pension funds (in Portuguese, Entidade Aberta de Previdência Complementar); and (2) the closed pension funds (in Portuguese, Entidade Fechada de Previdência Complementar).22 The open pension funds resemble the private pension plans of the third pillar in other countries, as in the Netherlands, which is open to all individuals. In Brazil, these are supervised by the Insurance Supervisory Authority (Superintendencia de Seguros Privados), which is a semiautonomous body subordinated to the Ministry of Finance.23 The closed pension funds are similar to the foundations in the Netherlands (see below in section 4.3), and they are supervised by the Complementary Pensions Secretariat (Secretaria da Previdência Complementar, SPC) part of the Ministry of Social Security.24 Closed pension funds, like the PREVI, are restricted to certain professional groups that are part of companies, union labors or class entities. The pension regulator for the occupational pension in Brazil is the National Superintendence of Complementary Social Security (or PREVIC). The PREVIC was created in 2009, it is an autonomous organization and it is financed by fees paid by the pension funds based on their assets under management.2526
The supervision, regulation and policy development of pension funds in Brazil is under the responsibility of different entities. The supervision of pension funds in Brazil is of the responsibility of the National Superintendence of Private Pension Funds (“PREVIC”) established in 2009 and subordinated to the Ministry of Social Security.27 The PREVIC supervises, among others, the governance, disclosure, investments and fees of closed pension funds.28 The PREVIC is a semi-autonomous agency and administered by a board. The regulation of the Brazilian pension system is part of the responsibilities of the National Board of Complementary Pensions whereas policy development is part of the responsibilities of the Secretariat of Complementary Pensions Policies.29 As for the investment regulation, Resolution n. 3.792/2009 of pension funds, was passed by the Brazilian Monetary Council (Conselho Monetario Nacional – “CMN”) in 2009, requiring closed pension funds to use due diligence, comply with the law and adopt high ethical standards in investment process and decision-making.3031 Article 16, chapter V (investment policy), paragraph 3, section VIII of the Resolution requires closed pension funds to inform through their investment policy whether they integrate environmental and social risks in their investment practices.32 The PREVIC, as part of its supervisory duties requires pension funds to include in their annual reports if they comply with Article 16 of the Resolution.33
Resolution n. 3.792/2009 has been criticized (PRI, Fiduciary Duty in the 21st Century, 2015) given the recent developments of political uncertainty and instability caused by the impeachment crisis.34 The PREVIC has started to review Resolution 3.792.35 This revision has been carried out by the PREVIC in consultation with the Ministry of Finance, the ABRAPP and other relevant entities in the Brazilian financial markets.36 The objectives of the new Resolution include, a new model more adequate to the integration of ESG risks in the pension funds investment policies, similar to the Brazilian Central Bank’s Resolution No.43275 requiring financial institutions to adopt a Social-Environmental-Responsibility Policy since 2014 (see Chapter 3). The PREVIC was expected to pick up the revision works in the second quarter of 2017 but no updates have been made public. In May 2017, the PREVIC has published Instruction nr. 5, 29/05/2017, creating a new pension fund category, the “Systemically Important Entity” (in Portuguese, Entidades Sistemicamente Importantes - ESI), differentiating pension funds according to their size and relevance for the pension system.3738 In May 2017, the PREVIC categorized 17 pension funds as Systemically Important Entities. In an effort to strengthen the Brazilian pension system, these Systemically Important Entities will therefore, be subject to higher scrutiny on monitoring, governance, reporting and to a permanent supervision of their activity.39
Other relevant regulation pertaining pension funds in Brazil include, the Complementary Pension Law No. 108/2001 (“LC 108/2001”) covering pension funds’ governance structure and the Complementary Pension Law No. 109/2001 (“LC 109/2001”) together with the Complementary Pension Law (“Conselho de Gestão de Previdência Complementar” - CGPC) CGPC Resolution 28/2009 covering the accounting aspects. These complementary laws aligned Brazilian pension system to international pension systems.40
Brazilian pension funds do not follow the prudent person rule; they are required to follow the investment quantitative limitations set by the Brazilian Monetary Council (CMN) Resolution No. 3.792/2009 (Articles 35 to 40, Chapter VII, Section I).4142E.g. 100% for fixed income, 20% structured investments and 70% listed companies. Brazil has, however, been moving from a strict quantitative limitations to the prudent person rule.43
In Brazil, fiduciaries have to comply with their duties under Article 4 (I, II, III and IV) of the Brazilian Monetary Council (CMN) Resolution No. 3,792/2009. This article 4 establishes that pension funds’ managers, in their administration duties, shall observe the principles of transparency, among others, carry out their activities in good faith, with loyalty and diligence, follow high ethical standards and adopt practices that ensure the compliance with their fiduciary duty towards the beneficiaries.44
b) “Banco do Brasil” Employees’ Pension Fund (PREVI)
The Brazilian National Bank Employees Pension Fund (PREVI) is a non-profit closed pension fund entity, based in the city of Rio de Janeiro, in Brazil.45 The PREVI is the largest pension fund in Latin America with USD$ 62,7 of investments or assets under management in 2014 and USD $55,6 as of 2015.46 In 2016 was ranked, by SITAWI, Finance For Good,47 in the first position as the top pension fund in Brazil and reported to have USD 48.71 billion (R$ 166.593.634.000) of assets under management.48 The PREVI is a pioneer investor integrating ESG risks into their investment processes. The PREVI’s commitment to responsible investment has not been yet influenced by its members’ demand. The communication department conducted research to ascertain whether ESG was considered relevant to its members. Although the result was positive, as members recognized the importance of these themes they did not make any related demands.49 Part of PREVI’s strategy as a responsible investor and showing the commitment of the pension fund to responsible investment, it has developed a Social and Environmental Responsibility Policy and a Code of Corporate Governance Practices (Yamahaki & Gaban, 2015).50 This two responsible investment tools help PREVI to incorporate ESG risks in its investment policy, to select sustainable investee companies, fosters ESG practices within the investee companies and promotes responsible investment to its peers.
The PREVI is the most sophisticated Brazilian (and Latin American) pension fund in terms of ESG practices and responsible investment.51 It incorporates ESG risks across different asset classes and participates in numerous national and international sustainability and responsible investment initiatives. As an example, PREVI is a signatory of the PRI52 part of the PRI board, is very active the engaging with its Brazilian peers and frequently participates in debates, conferences and other circles on responsible investment and sustainability reporting.
c) Relevant organizations for promoting sustainability and responsible investment reporting in Brazil
Besides the relevant work of the Ethos Institute,53 Global Reporting Initiative, UN- supported Principles for Responsible Investment, UN Global Compact and the Stock Exchange B3, former BM&F BOVESPA, in Brazil, which have greatly driven awareness of responsible investment and ESG best practices along the Brazilian responsible investment chain, there are three other organizations who have contributed to scale-up ESG best practices amongst investors. 1) The PREVIC, the pension funds’ supervisory authority, which have encouraged responsible investment through guidelines such as, the Guides for Best Practices in Pension Funds; 2) The ABRAPP, the Brazilian Association of Pension Funds which have also published relevant engaging principles such as, the Basic Principles of Social Responsibility. Another initiative of the ABRAPP is the Social Report (“Relatório Social”), which was developed in collaboration with the Brazilian Union of Pension Funds (SINAPP). The Social Report was published for the first time 2007, and the latest report was published in 2010.54 It was published representing the common interest of pension funds and to aid pension funds to integrate ESG risks in their investment processes. In 2014 ABRAPP published the Guide for Writing Sustainability Reports directed at the closed pension funds in Brazil.55 In this guide the ABRAPP recommends the GRI reporting guidelines, as a benchmark, to be used by pension funds and their investee companies in their sustainability reports.56 And, 3) the Brazilian Financial and Capital Markets Association (ANBIMA)57 founded in 2009. The ANBIMA published the first sustainability report in 2016, in this report the ANBIMA addresses ESG risks in the investment processes by asset managers.58 This report is a landmark in the Brazilian responsible investment arena. It recognizes the growing ESG risk awareness among pension funds and the responsible investment chain in Brazil, different maturity levels of implementation, a significant number of pension funds not yet engaged, a trend of continuous growth of ESG risk integration in the pension funds investment strategies, the direct link between ESG interest from ESG asset managers and consultants and the investors, the similarity of the development of ESG integration among Brazilian pension funds to others, internationally, the relevance of international commitments such as the COP 21 to drive responsible investment, also in Brazil.59