EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation: from ISD to MiFID II
Einde inhoudsopgave
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/5.VI.2.1:5.VI.2.1 General
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/5.VI.2.1
5.VI.2.1 General
Documentgegevens:
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás, datum 01-02-2021
- Datum
01-02-2021
- Auteur
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS266657:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Bank- en effectenrecht
Financieel recht / Europees financieel recht
Financiële dienstverlening / Financieel toezicht
Deze functie is alleen te gebruiken als je bent ingelogd.
The MiFID II equity pre-trade transparency regime relies on calculations and estimates. Similar to MiFID I, calculations and estimates are necessary to determine: (1) a ‘liquid market’, (2) the related standard market size (both relevant for the SI publication obligations), and (3) whether orders are ‘large in scale’ (relevant for the large in scale-waiver for RMs/MTFs and investment firms outside such venues in relation to client limit orders). New under MiFID II is that the equity calculations/estimates need to be made for a broader range of instruments, namely shares, depositary receipts, ETFs, certificates and other similar financial instruments traded on an RM/MTF (MiFID I was confined to shares admitted to trading on an RM).1 New under MiFID II is also that calculations need to be made for: (a) the double volume cap (relevant for two RM/MTF waivers), (b) the SI-definition (quantitative elements), and (c) the tick size (relevant for the RM/MTF/SI equity pre-trade transparency rules). Besides the double volume cap (ESMA), MiFID II requires the NCAs to perform the calculations/estimates. Many NCAs (not: all) have delegated their MiFID II calculation/estimation tasks, including the related data collection, to ESMA (so-called ‘delegating NCAs’).2 This means that where the MiFID II text refers to NCAs, ESMA will often perform the calculation/estimate in practice.