State aid to banks
Einde inhoudsopgave
State aid to banks (IVOR nr. 109) 2018/11.7.2:11.7.2 Has the Commission consistently taken into account this relevant characteristic?
State aid to banks (IVOR nr. 109) 2018/11.7.2
11.7.2 Has the Commission consistently taken into account this relevant characteristic?
Documentgegevens:
mr. drs. R.E. van Lambalgen, datum 01-12-2017
- Datum
01-12-2017
- Auteur
mr. drs. R.E. van Lambalgen
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS587041:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Europees financieel recht
Mededingingsrecht / EU-mededingingsrecht
Toon alle voetnoten
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
See section 11.10.
Deze functie is alleen te gebruiken als je bent ingelogd.
The table in Annex VII gives an overview of the cases characterised by cost- cutting measures. In almost every restructuring decision in the C-context, it is mentioned that the beneficiary bank has implemented cost-cutting measures. In the other contexts, this relevant characteristic cannot be found. This can be explained by the fact that operational efficiency is primarily important in the C-context; it is less important in the W-context. Indeed, if a bank is to be wound- down, then there is less need for measures that improve the operational efficiency of the bank. Admittedly, operational efficiency is also important in the T-context and S/T/W-context; but in these contexts, operational efficiency is usually achieved by cost synergies resulting from the integration of (part of) the beneficiary bank in the acquiring bank.1
To conclude, cost-cutting measures are not mentioned in every decision, but this can be explained by the relevant context.