Einde inhoudsopgave
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/18.IV.1.3.2
18.IV.1.3.2 Main changes from MiFID I to MiFID II
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás, datum 01-02-2021
- Datum
01-02-2021
- Auteur
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS266828:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Bank- en effectenrecht
Financieel recht / Europees financieel recht
Financiële dienstverlening / Financieel toezicht
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
For the sake of clarity, RMs, MTFs, and investment firms operating outside such venues (including, but not only, SIs) are permitted to publish more and faster equity pre- and post-trade data than MiFID II prescribes (e.g. the full order book or provide co-location). The MiFID II rules merely prescribe the minimum that needs to be in place across the EU Member States. The situation was the same under MiFID I and the ISD. For an examination, reference is made to chapters 3-5 (pre-trade transparency) and chapters 7-9 (post-trade transparency).
Art. 14-17 MiFIR.
The MiFID II equity pre- and post-trade transparency regime applies to (1) shares and depositary receipts, ETFs, certificates, and other similar financial instruments that are (2) traded on an RM or MTF.1 The MiFID II equity pre- and post-trade transparency rules are maximum harmonised, meaning that Member States cannot impose stricter or more lenient rules.2MiFID II tightens several aspects of the MiFID I equity transparency regime. MiFID II has extended the scope in terms of financial instruments subject to the equity pre- and post-trade transparency regime (points 1-2 above). National discretion in terms of waivers has been limited through rule-based rules and an institutionalised waiver process within ESMA. MiFID II reduces the dark trading possibilities on RMs and MTFs by limiting the use of the reference price and one type of negotiated trade waiver through the double volume cap.3MiFID II has fine-tuned the SI-definition4 and also requires SIs to display more pre-trade transparency compared to MiFID I.5 Timing requirements for post-trade data publication have been clarified and the time limits have been reduced. Harmonised post-trade data formats are in place to facilitate data quality and to support consolidation.6 Furthermore, MiFID II introduces a share-trading obligation to ensure share trading takes place on transparent venues (RM, MTF, SI or equivalent third-country trading venue).7 Last, but not least, MiFID II covers a far more operational regime in terms of transparency calculations and databases compared to MiFID I.