Einde inhoudsopgave
The EU VAT Treatment of Vouchers (FM nr. 157) 2019/3.8.2
3.8.2 A total legal prohibition on importation and marketing in the EU
Dr. J.B.O. Bijl, datum 01-05-2019
- Datum
01-05-2019
- Auteur
Dr. J.B.O. Bijl
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS595920:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Omzetbelasting / Levering van goederen en diensten
Omzetbelasting / Bijzondere OB-regelingen
Omzetbelasting / Vergoeding
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
See CJEU Cases C-294/82, Senta Einberger v Hauptzollamt Freiburg, ECLI:EU:C:1984:81, C-269/86, W. J. R. Mol v Inspecteur der Invoerrechten en Accijnzen, CLI:EU:C:1988:359and CJEU Case 289/86, Vereniging Happy Family Rustenburgerstraat v Inspecteur der Omzetbelasting, ECLI:EU:C:1988:360.
See CJEU Case C-343/89, Max Witzemann v Hauptzollamt München-Mitte,ECLI:EU:C:1990:445.
See CJEU Case 289/86, Vereniging Happy Family Rustenburgerstraat v Inspecteur der Omzetbelasting,ECLI:EU:C:1988:360, paragraphs 16 and 17.
See CJEU Case C-111/92, Wilfried Lange v Finanzamt Fürstenfeldbruck,ECLI:EU:C:1993:345.
See CJEU Case C-3/97, Criminal proceedings against John Charles Goodwin and Edward Thomas Unstead,ECLI:EU:C:1998:263.
See CJEU Case C-283/95, Karlheinz Fischer v Finanzamt Donaueschingen,ECLI:EU:C:1998:276.
See Case C-455/98, Tullihallitus v Kaupo Salumets and others [2000] ECR I-5003.
The CJEU has decided on several occasions that even if a supply is made within the territory of a Member State, for consideration by a taxable person acting as such, this supply cannot be subject to VAT if that transaction is subject to a total legal prohibition on importation and marketing in the EU. Examples of such transactions from CJEU case law are:
Importation and sale of illegal drugs;1 and
Importation of counterfeit currency.2
The reason that the CJEU provides for keeping these transactions to be outside the scope of VAT is as follows: the EU VAT Directive is based on Articles 99 and 100 of the EEC Treaty and its objective is the harmonization or approximation of the legislation of the Member States on turnover taxes 'in the interest of the common market'. Since the harmfulness of narcotic drugs is generally recognized, there is a prohibition in all the Member States on marketing them, with the exception of strictly controlled trade for use for medical and scientific purposes. Such drugs are, therefore, wholly alien to the provisions of the EU VAT Directive and, in consequence, to the provisions on the origination of a turnover tax debt.3
This means that as soon as there is some form of competition with legal goods or services, illegal transactions regarding the supply goods or services are (also) subject to VAT. Examples of these kind of transactions as found in CJEU case law are:
the exportation of specific goods to specific countries (e.g. software to former Eastern bloc countries);4
the supply of counterfeit perfume products;5
the organisation of unlawful games of chance;6 and
the importation of contraband ethyl alcohol.7