Female representation at the corporate top
Einde inhoudsopgave
Female representation at the corporate top (IVOR nr. 126) 2022/4:Chapter 4 Justifications of Dutch listed companies for gender equality and gender diversity and an assessment of certain aspects of companies’ diversity policies
Female representation at the corporate top (IVOR nr. 126) 2022/4
Chapter 4 Justifications of Dutch listed companies for gender equality and gender diversity and an assessment of certain aspects of companies’ diversity policies
Documentgegevens:
dr. mr. R.A. van ’t Foort-Diepeveen, datum 13-05-2022
- Datum
13-05-2022
- Auteur
dr. mr. R.A. van ’t Foort-Diepeveen
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS659270:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Ondernemingsrecht (V)
Ondernemingsrecht / Corporate governance
Toon alle voetnoten
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
This chapter is published as an article in: R.A. Diepeveen, T.E. Lambooy & R.M. Renes, ‘The Two-pronged Approach of the (Semi-) Legal Norms on Gender Diversity: Exploratory Empirical Research on Corporate Boards of Dutch Listed Companies’, International and Comparative Corporate Law Journal, 2017, 12(2), p. 103-139. The research for this chapter ended in November 2016.
Deze functie is alleen te gebruiken als je bent ingelogd.
Abstract
In this chapter, two different perspectives on diversity and gender equality in boards of listed companies in the Netherlands are discussed: first, the diversity perspective which focuses on better decision-making capabilities of gender-diverse teams (i.e. the economic perspective), and second, the gender equality perspective which aims to realize gender equality in all levels of society pursuant to international human rights treaties and national law (i.e. the rights-based perspective).
This two-pronged approach is presented as follows: on the basis of a literature study and desk research, the authors first set out the views discussed in the extant literature on the economic perspective and, next, the legal context applicable to the rights-based perspective. Subsequently, the application in practice of these two perspectives are tested by analyzing unique empirical data collected by the authors from listed companies in the Netherlands.
The empirical data are collected in two studies assigned by the Code Monitoring Committee (the Committee) to the authors in 2014 and 2015. This Committee annually reports on the compliance by listed companies with the Code. One of the areas of concern is diversity in corporate boards as, since 2008, the Code requires that companies have a policy to realize a diverse board composition, gender being one of the indicators. The Code applies on a comply or explain basis.
The empirical study revealed that Dutch companies, in their annual reporting on their board diversity policies, often referred to the Dutch corporate law provision concerning the target figure. This provision requires of large companies that their corporate boards (both the board of directors and the supervisory board) comprise at least 30 percent women and at least 30 percent men. Like the Code, this legal provision also applies on a comply or explain basis. This law had been enacted for a limited period of time, i.e. from 2013 until 2016, but a legislative proposal is pending to extend the application of this target figure provision until 2020.
The authors discovered that the two perspectives (i.e. the economic and the rights-based perspectives) are often mixed up by companies, government representatives and institutions, and other parties (together: stakeholders) who deal with the theme of (gender) diversity in corporate boards. In this chapter, the authors elaborate on these two perspectives, raise questions in regard to the application of the (semi-)legal norms in this area, and share innovative findings regarding the measures taken by progressive Dutch listed companies in order to realize a diverse board composition, and in particular to comply with the statutory target figure on female board representation.
4.1 Introduction4.2 Literature review on gender diversity in boards: the economic decision-making perspective4.3 A rights-based perspective on gender diversity in corporate boards4.4 Methodology of the empirical studies in 2014 and 20154.5 Analysis of the results of the empirical Nyenrode studies I and II4.6 Concluding remarks