Einde inhoudsopgave
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/15.II
15.II CESR standards for ATSs
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás, datum 01-02-2021
- Datum
01-02-2021
- Auteur
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS266778:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Bank- en effectenrecht
Financieel recht / Europees financieel recht
Financiële dienstverlening / Financieel toezicht
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
ATSs were not defined under the ISD. CESR referred to ATSs as investment firms that: (a) qualified as a ‘qualifying system’ and (b) provided trading in a financial instrument admitted to trading on an RM (CESR, Standards for Alternative Trading Systems, July 2002 (CESR/02-086b), p. 4). The definition of qualifying systems was almost identical to the MTF-definition introduced under MiFID I (recital 6 MiFID I). For a detailed examination of ATSs under the ISD, reference is made to chapters 3 and 7.
CESR, Standards for Alternative Trading Systems, 2002 (CESR/02-086b), p. 10.
CESR, Standards for Alternative Trading Systems, 2002 (CESR/02-086b), p. 10.
CESR, Standards for Alternative Trading Systems, 2002 (CESR/02-086b), p. 10.
As noted, the ISD and FESCO provided no rules/guidance concerning data prices.1 CESR provided broad data accessibility standards for ATS.2 CESR recommended that ATSs needed to ‘make publicly available, on a reasonable commercial basis, information about quotes and/or orders that the qualifying system displays or advertises to the system users. Similarly, operators needed to make publicly available, on a reasonable commercial basis, information relating to completed transactions that the systems provide to users’ (emphasis added).3 In other words, CESR provided as a standard that pre- and post-trade data needed to be made available on a reasonable commercial basis. CESR stated that ATSs could fulfill the reasonable commercial basis-obligation by publishing the data ‘on a web-site, making it available to an information vendor (data vendor) or supplying it to any consolidated quotation system’.4 CESR thus enabled ATSs to comply with the reasonable commercial basis-provision by means of several publication arrangements. CESR did not specify the meaning of the term ‘on a reasonable commercial basis’.5 The CESR standard was in effect quite broad.