Einde inhoudsopgave
Treaty Application for Companies in a Group (FM nr. 178) 2022/6.2.3.1
6.2.3.1 Introduction
L.C. van Hulten, datum 06-07-2022
- Datum
06-07-2022
- Auteur
L.C. van Hulten
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS659488:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Omzetbelasting / Plaats van levering en dienst
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
A. Ting, The Taxation of Corporate Groups under Consolidation: An International Comparison, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2013, par. 2.3.2.
It would additionally mean that other articles that deal with business profits are no longer necessary for legal entities. This means that the scope of art. 6 and art. 8 OECD MTC should be restricted to individuals carrying on an enterprise (as the term enterprise applies to the carrying on of any business, art. 3, par. 1, sub c, OECD MTC) only. The provision on directors’ fees as included in art. 16 OECD MTC applies to individuals as well as entities holding directorships (Commentary on art. 16 OECD MTC, par. 1). If a full unitary business approach would be chosen, the scope of application of this provision should be limited to individuals (it could also be considered to abolish the provision in full, see, e.g., L.C. van Hulten, ‘Bestuurdersartikel in verdrag overbodig?’, Weekblad Fiscaal Recht 2013/1264). In art. 21, par. 2 OECD MTC a provision for specific situations including permanent establishments is included. Such a provision would no longer be necessary if the advocated unitary business approach would be applied.
A unitary business concept within tax treaties would mean that taxation would take place as much as possible in line with the economic reality that an entity is usually part of a bigger enterprise with a shared profit motive. As for tax treaties based on the OECD MTC a separate entity approach is applied, recognizing a unitary business for tax treaty purposes does not seem to fit within the current framework. Under a unitary business approach, the taxable basis of an entity can be influenced by the taxable income and loss of group entities. An attempt to apply such a system across borders would not be in concurrence with the building blocks of the international tax system as reflected in tax treaties.1
As indicated in the previous section, a switch towards unitary taxation would require changes in the national legislation. Similarly, it would require changes to tax treaties. The required changes from a tax treaty perspective with respect to the chapter II, III and V of the OECD MTC are described in the following section. The emphasis is on the provisions that would require substantive changes and the provisions that play an important role in a group context.2 The changes would have to be made multilaterally.
As tax treaties solely allocate taxing rights, a change in the approach would influence ‘who to tax’ and ‘where to tax’. The taxable basis as such (‘what to tax’) is governed by domestic law rather than by tax treaties. Also, the tax rate (‘how much tax’) is an element that is in principle governed by domestic legislation.