EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation: from ISD to MiFID II
Einde inhoudsopgave
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/16.III.3:16.III.3 Obligations
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/16.III.3
16.III.3 Obligations
Documentgegevens:
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás, datum 01-02-2021
- Datum
01-02-2021
- Auteur
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS267032:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Bank- en effectenrecht
Financieel recht / Europees financieel recht
Financiële dienstverlening / Financieel toezicht
Toon alle voetnoten
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
CESR, Publication and Consolidation of MiFID Market Transparency Data, February 2007 (CESR/07-043), p. 10.
CESR, Publication and Consolidation of MiFID Market Transparency Data, February 2007 (CESR/07-043), p. 10. Similar CEPS, MiFID 2.0: Casting New Light on Europe’s Capital Markets, 2011, p. 78.
CESR, Publication and Consolidation of MiFID Market Transparency Data, February 2007 (CESR/07-043), p. 10.
Deze functie is alleen te gebruiken als je bent ingelogd.
CESR noted that making available MiFID I equity pre- and post-trade data by RMs, MTFs, and investment firms (including SIs) could not be conditional on the purchase of other bundled services and/or data. CESR stated that it would not be an acceptable practice, for instance, where an investment firm would bundle it data to other services, such as financial research.1 CESR also recommended the full unbundling of pre- and post-trade data, that is – post-trade data would have to be sold separately from pre-trade data (and vice versa).2
CESR still permitted RMs, MTFs, and investment firms (including SIs) to make different levels or depths of pre- and post-trade information available to the market on different commercial terms.3 In other words, whether or not to make various combinations of data available was left up to the market, as long as the equity pre- and post-trade data was not conditional on other services and/or data.