Directors' liability
Einde inhoudsopgave
Directors' liability (IVOR nr. 101) 2017/5:Chapter 5 Closing
Directors' liability (IVOR nr. 101) 2017/5
Chapter 5 Closing
Documentgegevens:
mr. drs. N.T. Pham, datum 09-01-2017
- Datum
09-01-2017
- Auteur
mr. drs. N.T. Pham
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS392802:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Ondernemingsrecht / Rechtspersonenrecht
Deze functie is alleen te gebruiken als je bent ingelogd.
The purpose of this dissertation was to explore the potential of directors’ liability as a mechanism for controlling the behaviour of directors. Recognising the various dimensions of directors’ liability and concepts of directors’ discretion and marginal judicial review to control directors’ behaviour (see Chapter 1), I studied directors’ liability as a system of sanctions and protections impacting on Dutch corporate governance. I identified three areas of research: 1) defensive behaviour among company directors; 2) serious reproach as the analytical framework for reviewing director’s liability in the context of art. 2:9, 6:162 and 2:138/248 DCC; and 3) directors’ ‘subjective good faith’ as a basic condition for valid discharge claims.Within these three research areas, I considered directors’ liability from the perspective of implicit and explicit sanction and protection measures. The findings, conclusions and propositions for improving the legal framework can be read in Chapters 2, 3 and 4. In this closing of the book, I aimto give some final reflections on how the research findings relate to existing debates and developments regarding directors’ liability.
5.1 Convergence in judicial review through the open norm of ‘serious reproach’5.2 Marginal judicial review and business judgement rule5.3 Bona fide directors should not fear directors’ liability