Social enterprises in the EU
Einde inhoudsopgave
Social enterprises in the EU (IVOR nr. 111) 2018/5.2.3.3:5.2.3.3 Participatory governance in the Netherlands
Social enterprises in the EU (IVOR nr. 111) 2018/5.2.3.3
5.2.3.3 Participatory governance in the Netherlands
Documentgegevens:
mr. A. Argyrou, datum 01-02-2018
- Datum
01-02-2018
- Auteur
mr. A. Argyrou
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS591660:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Ondernemingsrecht / Rechtspersonenrecht
Toon alle voetnoten
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
See accordingly Colenbrander et al., ‘Inclusive Governance in Social Enterprises in the Netherlands – A Case Study’ [2017] 88(4) Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 543-566.
Deze functie is alleen te gebruiken als je bent ingelogd.
In Chapter 4, the research is extended for illustrative purposes to the Netherlands, a country which does not provide for legal tailor-made participatory governance structures for social enterprises. Survey-based research on Dutch social enterprises demonstrates that the input from key stakeholder groups is considered fairly in the decision-making processes of the participating social enterprises. This input is also particularly informal, direct, and ad hoc, i.e. it does not have a regular or structural character. Informal cooperation takes place by means of commonly occurring types of participatory stakeholder mechanisms, such as: (i) stakeholder consultation processes; (ii) technology interactions (newsletters, websites, and social media); (iii) stakeholder thematic events; and (iv) evaluation forms and satisfaction surveys. However, these results are only exploratory and encourage scholars to conduct further in-depth qualitative research on stakeholder participation in the governance of Dutch social enterprises to examine in an in-depth manner the perceptions, motivations, and drivers of various types of stakeholders to participate in the governance of social enterprises.1 The findings from a qualitative study on stakeholder participation in the Dutch social enterprises may then be compared with the findings of the meta-synthesis developed in this doctoral thesis to unravel similarities and differences in the participatory governance of social enterprises which either employ or do not employ tailor-made legal forms.