State aid to banks
Einde inhoudsopgave
State aid to banks (IVOR nr. 109) 2018/9.8.6:9.8.6 Concluding remarks on burden-sharing
State aid to banks (IVOR nr. 109) 2018/9.8.6
9.8.6 Concluding remarks on burden-sharing
Documentgegevens:
mr. drs. R.E. van Lambalgen, datum 01-12-2017
- Datum
01-12-2017
- Auteur
mr. drs. R.E. van Lambalgen
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS592969:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Europees financieel recht
Mededingingsrecht / EU-mededingingsrecht
Toon alle voetnoten
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
It is worth stressing that the current section concerned a specific form of burden-sharing, namely burden-sharing by the bank with respect to impaired assets. The more general application of the burden-sharing principle will be discussed in chapter 12.
Deze functie is alleen te gebruiken als je bent ingelogd.
The current section has illustrated that burden-sharing1 is essentially based on two elements: i) a sufficiently large write-down or first-loss tranche, and ii) an adequate remuneration. There is another element: i.e. the claw-back. However, this element is related to the other two elements. A claw-back mechanism is required when the transfer value exceeds the REV. The difference between the transfer value and REV constitutes additional aid which has to be recovered (by means of a claw-back). It should be pointed out that a transfer value exceeding the REV means that the write-down or first-loss tranche was not sufficiently large. Thus, a claw-back is needed when the first element of burden-sharing is insufficient. This way, the claw-back is related to the first element of burden- sharing. It should also be pointed out that a claw-back can be achieved by increasing the level of remuneration. This way, the claw-back is related to the second element of burden-sharing.