Einde inhoudsopgave
Social enterprises in the EU (IVOR nr. 111) 2018/2.7.3.1
2.7.3.1 Profit distribution constraint: the asset-lock scheme
mr. A. Argyrou, datum 01-02-2018
- Datum
01-02-2018
- Auteur
mr. A. Argyrou
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS592834:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Ondernemingsrecht / Rechtspersonenrecht
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
2004 Act, ss. 30 and 31. The explanatory notes also explain that the prohibition covers ‘every description of distribution of the company’s assets to its members, made in their capacity as members, such as dividends, issues of bonus shares, and payments on the purchase or redemption of shares or on the reduction of share capital’. Explanatory Notes to the 2004 Act, paras. 207-208. Liao (n 2) 294.
CIC Regulations of 2005, Part 6, regs. 17-25.
The asset-lock scheme is justified. It is based on a constraint applicable to the inappropriate distribution of the CIC’s financial assets, profits and surpluses to its members and/or investors. Consequently, the assets should be used for the benefit of the community. Explanatory Notes to the 2004 Act, paras. 207-208; Office of the Regulator of Community Interest Companies, ‘Information and guidance notes: Chapter 7 – Financing Community interest Companies’ (October 2014) 4.
2004 Act, s. 32(4)(a) and (b).
CIC Regulations of 2005, Sch 1, Sch 2, Sch 3; McLaughlin (n 78) 51.
2004 Act, s. 30.
The general rule is subject to regulatory provisions. Those may provide otherwise. Explanatory Notes to the 2004 Act, paras. 207-208.
2004 Act, s. 30(5)(a)-(c).
Explanatory Notes to the 2004 Act, para. 211.
2004 Act, s. 30(5)(b).
ibid s. 30(6)(a) and (b).
CIC Regulations of 2005, reg. 22(1)(a)-(c).
ibid reg. 22(3) and (8).
The ‘distributable profits’ are calculated as the accumulated, realised profits of the CIC that have not been previously used by the CIC by distribution or capitalisation, minus the accumulated, realised losses that were not previously written off in a reduction or reorganisation of the CIC’s capital. As such, this formula follows the general pattern established by Section 830 of the Companies Act 2006 for the calculation of distributable profits. CIC Regulations of 2005, reg. 2.
In that case, the dividend cap will not apply if the CIC shares are owned by an asset-locked body, which is specified in the CIC’s AoA as a potential recipient of the CIC’s assets or if the Regulator has provided consent to the distribution of the dividend. CIC Regulations of 2005, reg. 17(3)-(5). McLaughlin (n 78) 51.
Regulatory Guidance explains that ‘debenture’ constitutes a financial instrument that is ‘any document which creates or acknowledges a debt, but it is most frequently used either in connection with lending against the security of the [CIC’s] company’s assets (mortgage debentures) or to describe the issue of corporate bonds (where the company, instead of borrowing under contractual arrangements with financial institutions, sells bonds in exchange for cash to investors more generally: the investors then receive specified interest and capital repayments, and may in addition be able to make a profit by trading in the bonds themselves’. CIC Regulations of 2005, regs. 21 and 22(1)(c). CIC Regulator Office, ‘Chapter 7’ (n 198) 7; Office of the Regulator of Community Interest Companies, ‘Information and guidance notes: Chapter 6 – The asset lock’ (October 2014) 8.
CIC Regulations of 2005, reg. 22(4)(7); CIC Regulator Office, ‘Chapter 6’ (n 211) 8.
The CIC’s policy on the distribution of dividends should be laid down in its AoA. The economic right to dividends constitutes the shareholder’s entitlement to benefits from the company’s profits in the form of dividends. However, in the case of the CIC, a restrictive scheme has been put in place regarding the distribution of profits, assets and dividends to shareholders, namely: the so-called ‘asset-lock’ scheme. The asset-lock scheme is a set of restrictions in the provisions of the 2004 Act1 and the CIC Regulations of 2005, which prohibit the distribution of assets to the CIC’s members/shareholders and other investors.2 The distribution is prohibited either during the active and operational period of the CIC or at the winding-up of the company.3 The asset-lock is a mandatory provision that must be included in the CIC’s constitutional documents.4 The asset-lock provisions in the AoA should explain how the distribution of the CIC’s assets is performed in the company inclusive of the period of winding up. Additionally, there are restrictions, which prohibit the CIC from transferring the company’s assets to other organisations. The AoA should contain minimum statutory restrictions stipulated in the CIC Regulations of 2005 with respect to the transfer of assets which require that the asset transfer can only take place: (i) for full consideration; (ii) to other asset-locked bodies which are specified in the CIC’s AoA; (iii) to other asset-locked bodies with the consent of the Regulator; or (iv) for the benefit of the community, i.e. following the CIC objectives.5
The implementation of the asset-lock provisions is subject to the Regulator’s supervisory power. Section 30 of the 2004 Act regulates the asset-lock scheme,6 laying down the general rule that prohibits CICs from distributing their assets to their members.7 Section 30(5)(a)-(b) of the 2004 Act also confers a right on the Regulator to impose certain limits on the distribution of assets thus imposing limits on the maximum amount of financial returns that the investors of the CIC can receive, i.e. dividend caps.8 Firstly, the Regulator may (a) set a ‘limit’ by reference to a rate determined by any other person. The explanatory notes further explain that the limit can be set by reference to an index, such as the Bank of England base lending rate to comply with national economic and governmental policy.9 Secondly, it is at the discretion of the Regulator to (b) impose a broad scope of different limits ‘for different descriptions of community interest companies’ applying to different categories of CICs according to their activity, size, sector or geographical area.10 In this respect, Section 30(6) addresses specific factors that the Regulator ‘must’ and ‘may’ take into consideration prior to determining the ‘limits’. The Regulator must: (i) undertake appropriate consultation before setting the limit; and (ii) in setting a limit, have regard to the likely impact on community interest companies.11
All types of dividend caps are regulated by Regulation 22(1)(a)-(c) of the CIC Regulations of 2005, which provide for the amount of profits that can be paid to shareholders. According to Regulation 22, the dividend-related cap imposed is referred to as the aggregate dividend cap.12 The Regulator is the person authorised to issue and/or revises the cap under the approval and the supervision of the Secretary of State.13 The aggregate dividend cap is determined as a percentage of the CIC’s distributable profits and is currently fixed at 35% of the CIC’s distributable profits.14 It is noteworthy that the CIC Regulations of 2005 allow unlimited distributions to be made to members, which are themselves CICs or charities under the concept of ‘exempt dividends’.15 Also regulated in Regulations 21 and 22(c) is the interest cap that on the basis of the asset-lock applies to debenture16 or any debt issued by any CIC. Such debenture includes for example mortgage debenture or CIC issued bonds. As of 1 October 2014 this is a fixed rate of 20%, which is expressed in Regulation 22(4)(7) as a percentage of the average amount of debt, or the sum outstanding under a debenture, during the 12 month period immediately preceding the date on which the interest on that debt or debenture becomes due.17