State aid to banks
Einde inhoudsopgave
State aid to banks (IVOR nr. 109) 2018/9.8.5:9.8.5 Remuneration in case of a split-up of the bank
State aid to banks (IVOR nr. 109) 2018/9.8.5
9.8.5 Remuneration in case of a split-up of the bank
Documentgegevens:
mr. drs. R.E. van Lambalgen, datum 01-12-2017
- Datum
01-12-2017
- Auteur
mr. drs. R.E. van Lambalgen
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS588238:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Europees financieel recht
Mededingingsrecht / EU-mededingingsrecht
Toon alle voetnoten
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
Dunfermline, NN19/2009, 25 January 2010, para. 78. The same considerations can be found in the decision on Quinn Insurance (SA.33023, 12 October 2011, para. 114). Also in this case, the Commission came to the conclusion that the remuneration requirement was not met.
Deze functie is alleen te gebruiken als je bent ingelogd.
Section 9.3.1 introduced the cases in which the split-up of the bank was assessed under the IAC. One of these cases was the case of Dunfermline. In the decision on Dunfermline, the Commission noted that there was no remuneration paid for the implied asset relief by the Dunfermline business transferred to Nationwide. In addition, the Commission noted that the UK State would not recuperate any benefit which the Dunfermline business transferred to Nationwide might enjoy as a result of the asset relief measure through a higher sale price of the assets, since the business had already been sold without any possibility of revising the price obtained. The Commission therefore concluded that the remuneration criterion was not met.1 The consequences of this conclusion will be discussed in section 9.10.