Einde inhoudsopgave
Public funding of failing banks in the European Union (LBF vol. 19) 2020/3.8.2
3.8.2 Measures imposed by Member States through national legislation
mr. M. Louisse-Read, datum 01-06-2020
- Datum
01-06-2020
- Auteur
mr. M. Louisse-Read
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS213936:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Europees financieel recht
Staatssteun (V)
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
EC, 23 December 2015, C(2015) 9526 final (SA.39451 – Banca Tercas), par. 104.
Iftinchi 2017, p. 73. See e.g. ECJ, 19 July 2016, C-526/14, ECLI:EU:C:2016:570 (Kotnik v Slovenia).
Directive 2012/30/EU (the Second Company Law Directive). This directive recast the Second Council Directive 77/91/EEC.
Other safeguards can for example be formed by the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations or the right to property (2013 Banking Communication, point 19). Discussion of such other safeguards it outside the scope of this dissertation.
When contracts do not foresee any conversion clauses and measures cannot be imposed in cooperation with shareholders or creditors, Member States can adopt specific legislation.
In the case of Banca Tercas, it was, for example, considered that no additional sacrifice of subordinated debt-holders was legally feasible, since under the current law the latter could be forced to share losses only in the event of compulsory administrative liquidation.1
There are examples of Member States that have adopted specific legislation to impose e.g. mandatory conversion or write down as a pre-condition for granting State aid or to take over a bank without the consent of the general meeting.2 There are a number of safeguards in that respect. Below, the ‘no creditor worse off’ principle and the Second Company Law Directive3 are discussed.4
3.8.2.1 Compatibility with the ‘no creditor worse off’ principle3.8.2.2 Compatibility with the Second Company Law Directive