EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation: from ISD to MiFID II
Einde inhoudsopgave
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/8.II.1.2.2:8.II.1.2.2 Financial instruments
EU Equity pre- and post-trade transparency regulation (LBF vol. 21) 2021/8.II.1.2.2
8.II.1.2.2 Financial instruments
Documentgegevens:
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás, datum 01-02-2021
- Datum
01-02-2021
- Auteur
mr. J.E.C. Gulyás
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS266527:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Financieel recht / Bank- en effectenrecht
Financieel recht / Europees financieel recht
Financiële dienstverlening / Financieel toezicht
Toon alle voetnoten
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
MiFID I did not cover a definition of ‘shares’. Shares were merely referred to as ‘shares in companies’ (art. 4(18(a) MiFID I. For a further examination of the term ‘shares’, reference is made to chapter 1(section IV).
Recital 46 MiFID I Directive.
Deze functie is alleen te gebruiken als je bent ingelogd.
In terms of financial instruments, MiFID I was more limited compared to the ISD. The ISD post-trade transparency obligations applied to a wide range of financial instruments, including shares, depositary receipts, bonds, and derivatives.1 By contrast, the MiFID I post-trade transparency regime applied to (a) shares2 that were (b) admitted to trading on an RM.3 Given the latter conditions, shares only admitted to trading on an MTF were outside the scope. In addition, equity-like instruments (e.g. depositary receipts) and non-equity instruments were outside the scope of the MiFID I post-trade transparency regime. MiFID I permitted (not: obliged) Member States to expand the post-trade transparency obligations to other financial instruments than shares.4