Einde inhoudsopgave
Female representation at the corporate top (IVOR nr. 126) 2022/3.3.4.1
3.3.4.1 Figures
dr. mr. R.A. van ’t Foort-Diepeveen, datum 13-05-2022
- Datum
13-05-2022
- Auteur
dr. mr. R.A. van ’t Foort-Diepeveen
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS659210:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Ondernemingsrecht (V)
Ondernemingsrecht / Corporate governance
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
Since 2013, the Monitoring Committee conducts research into compliance with the target figure on behalf of the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science and issues its reports to the government. See Pouwels & Hendrikse, Topvrouwen in de wachtkamer: Bedrijvenmonitor 2012-2015, 2015, p. 13; Pouwels & van den Brink, Zonder wet geen voortgang: Bedrijvenmonitor Topvrouwen 2020, 2021, p. 20. The Bedrijvenmonitor is the official source for the monitoring of the target figure. See Boschma et al., Ondernemingsrecht, 2018b, 2018/44(6), p. 272. The Dutch Female Board Index has provided an overview of the number of women on the boards of all Dutch listed companies on a yearly basis since 2007. The Dutch Female Board Index has been conducted by M. Lückerath-Rovers under the auspices of several universities throughout the years. See also Lückerath-Rovers, Deakin Law Review, 2015, 20(1), p. 87-88.
The number of large companies that were taken into account for the selection of the studies varied from 586 to 851 companies. See Pouwels & van den Brink, Zonder wet geen voortgang: Bedrijvenmonitor Topvrouwen 2020, 2021, p. 113.
Table 3.2 is composed by the author on the basis of information published in the reports of the Bedrijvenmonitor and the Dutch Female Board Index for the period 2012-2020. The sources for the figures of the Bedrijvenmonitor are: Pouwels & Hendrikse, Topvrouwen in de wachtkamer: Bedrijvenmonitor 2012-2015, 2015, p. 27, 28 and 34; Pouwels & Hendrikse, Waiting on the world to change: Bedrijvenmonitor Topvrouwen 2016, 2016, p. 28 and 33; Pouwels & Hendrikse, Een beetje beter, maar nog lang niet voldoende: Bedrijvenmonitor Topvrouwen 2017, 2017, p. 27 and 31; Pouwels et al., Streefcijfers te vrijblijvend; tijd voor een quotum: Bedrijvenmonitor Topvrouwen 2019, 2019, p. 23 and 28; Pouwels & van den Brink, Zonder wet geen voortgang: Bedrijvenmonitor Topvrouwen 2020, 2021, p. 26, 28, 32 and 33. The figures for 2020 are for mid-2020. For 2020 the percentages of companies with women in their management and supervisory board are not available. The sources for the figures of the Female Board Index are: M. Lückerath-Rovers, The Dutch Female Board Index 2012, 2012, p. 11-12, 15 and 19-20; M. Lückerath-Rovers, The Dutch Female Board Index 2013, 2013b, p. 11 and 15; M. Lückerath-Rovers, The Dutch Female Board Index 2014, 2014, p. 10, 14 and 18; M. Lückerath-Rovers, The Dutch Female Board Index 2015, 2015, p. 8, 12 and 16; Lückerath-Rovers, The Dutch Female Board Index 2016, 2016, p. 8, 11 and 14; M. Lückerath-Rovers, The Dutch Female Board Index 2017, 2017, p. 8, 11 and 13; M. Lückerath-Rovers, The Dutch Female Board Index 2018, 2018, p. 8, 12 and 15; M. Lückerath-Rovers, The Dutch Female Board Index 2019, 2019, p. 8, 11 and 14; Lückerath-Rovers, The Dutch Female Board Index 2020, 2020, p. 14, 17, 18 and 20.
The 54 percent concerns the percentage of companies that achieved 33 percent women on the supervisory board (in anticipation of the proposed quota).
Pouwels & Hendrikse, Een beetje beter, maar nog lang niet voldoende: Bedrijvenmonitor Topvrouwen 2017, 2017, p. 111; Pouwels et al., Streefcijfers te vrijblijvend; tijd voor een quotum: Bedrijvenmonitor Topvrouwen 2019, 2019, p. 95; Pouwels & van den Brink, Zonder wet geen voortgang: Bedrijvenmonitor Topvrouwen 2020, 2021, p. 91; Kamerstukken II, 2020/21, 35628, nr. 3, p. 4; Kamerstukken II, 2020/21, 35628, nr. 6.
Pouwels & van den Brink, Zonder wet geen voortgang: Bedrijvenmonitor Topvrouwen 2020, 2021, p. 33 and 37. See also Kamerstukken II, 2020/21, 35628, nr. 3, p. 6.
Pouwels & Hendrikse, Topvrouwen in de wachtkamer: Bedrijvenmonitor 2012-2015, 2015, p. 50; Pouwels & Hendrikse, Waiting on the world to change: Bedrijvenmonitor Topvrouwen 2016, 2016, p. 44; Pouwels & Hendrikse, Een beetje beter, maar nog lang niet voldoende: Bedrijvenmonitor Topvrouwen 2017, 2017, p. 42-43; Pouwels et al., Streefcijfers te vrijblijvend; tijd voor een quotum: Bedrijvenmonitor Topvrouwen 2019, 2019, p. 43; Pouwels & van den Brink, Zonder wet geen voortgang: Bedrijvenmonitor Topvrouwen 2020, 2021, p. 93; Lennarts, in: Diversiteit. Een multidisciplinaire terreinverkenning, 2020, p. 168; Kamerstukken II, 2015/16, 30420, 227, p. 4; Kamerstukken II, 2015/16, 34435, nr. 3, p. 2.
Pouwels et al., Streefcijfers te vrijblijvend; tijd voor een quotum: Bedrijvenmonitor Topvrouwen 2019, 2019, p. 6 and 102.
In the Netherlands, the progress in the percentage and number of women on corporate boards of large companies and listed companies has been monitored in the Corporate Monitor Women at the Top (Bedrijvenmonitor Topvrouwen) (Bedrijvenmonitor) and in the Dutch Female Board Index respectively.1 The Bedrijvenmonitor, conducted by the Monitoring Committee Women at the Top (Commissie Monitoring Topvrouwen) (Monitoring Committee), monitors yearly the progress made in reaching the target figure of 30 percent since introduction of the target figure. The Bedrijvenmonitor takes a random selection into account of the largest companies,2 i.e. those companies to which the target figure applied. The Dutch Female Board Index considers the number of women on the management and supervisory boards of all Dutch listed companies, irrespective of whether they are large or small, i.e., approximately 90 companies. Table 3.2 shows the progress made in increasing the percentage of women on corporate boards of Dutch listed and large companies between 2012 and 2020, according to both monitoring systems.
Table 3.2 Percentage of women on corporate boards of Dutch listed and large companies3
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Percentage of women on management boards
Bedrijvenmonitor
7,4%
8,9%
9,6%
9,6%
10,7%
11,0%
12,4%
12,4%
13,4%
Female Board Index
4,6%
4,7%
6,0%
7,8%
7,1%
6,2%
5,7%
8,5%
12,4%
Percentage of women on supervisory boards
Bedrijvenmonitor
9,8%
11,2%
11,2%
12,5%
15,0%
15,4%
18,4%
20,4%
21,9%
Female Board Index
13,3%
18,0%
19,5%
21,3%
23,1%
24,6%
25,1%
26,8%
29,5%
Percentage of companies that have women on their management boards
Bedrijvenmonitor
19,7%
22,7%
23,9%
25,8%
27,3%
29,4%
33%
33,2%
-
Female Board Index
11%
12%
15%
17%
17%
14%
14%
19%
26%
Percentage of companies that have women on their supervisory boards
Bedrijvenmonitor
32,5%
36,3%
36,7%
38,3%
46,9%
46,5%
51%
56,7%
-
Female Board Index
42%
60%
63%
68%
71%
79%
76%
81%
79%
Percentage of companies that achieved 30% women in both management board and supervisory board = compliance with target figure
Bedrijvenmonitor
4,5%
5,3%
3,6%
3,9%
5,8%
6,0%
8,3%
9,6%
-
Female Board Index
1/96= 1%
0/85= 0%
1/87=
1%
0/84=
0%
2/83= 2%
6/85= 7%
5/90=
5,5%
6/88= 6,8%
15/94
=16%
54%4
The aim of the target figure was to attain a more gender balanced representation in the management and supervisory boards of large companies, which meant that the boards should be composed of at least 30 percent women (and at least 30 percent men). However, as the figures show, this objective is far from being met. The target figure did not bring about the desired change in the percentage of women on corporate boards of large companies because the target figure of 30 percent women in both the supervisory board and management board was not met. The figures show that by the end of 2020, the number of female supervisory board members came close to reaching 30 percent, albeit only for listed companies, whereas the number of female management board members remained at approximately 12 and 13 percent for listed companies and large companies respectively. Although the percentage of companies with women on their supervisory boards differs according to the Dutch Female Board Index and the Bedrijvenmonitor, by the end of 2019, 19 percent of the examined companies still did not have any women at all on their supervisory boards, and over 66 percent of these companies did not have any women on their management boards, even when considering the most favorable figures. When considering both boards, only a poor percentage of companies actually succeeded in meeting the target figure. In the Bedrijvenmonitor it was also noted that progress, albeit limited, in the number of women on boards can only be ascribed to a small number of companies.5
The Bedrijvenmonitor discusses a few reasons mentioned by large companies as to why they did not make an effort to achieve a more balanced distribution in their boards in 2019: (1) a balanced distribution cannot be achieved because the company board consists of one person, (2) there were no appointments or a limited number of new appointments and/or (3) companies want to opt for ‘quality’ in appointing board members and that means that they do not necessarily want to consider gender when selecting new board members.6
Besides the limited progress that has been made in increasing the percentage of women on corporate boards, the majority of the companies that failed to meet the target figure also did not provide an explanation in their annual reports as to why the target figure was not met. Less than 10 percent of the companies that failed to meet the target figure complied with their reporting obligations in their annual report of 2019.7 Consequently, 90 percent of the companies did not comply with the target figure legislation.8