Einde inhoudsopgave
Remedies for infringements of EU law in legal relationships between private parties (LBF vol. 18) 2019/3.3.2.1
3.3.2.1 Direct horizontal effect of the freedom to provide services
mr. I.V. Aronstein, datum 01-09-2019
- Datum
01-09-2019
- Auteur
mr. I.V. Aronstein
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS141445:1
- Vakgebied(en)
EU-recht / Algemeen
Burgerlijk procesrecht / Algemeen
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
In those cases the right to freedom of expression and the right to assembly. The Court applies the same rule to the right to collective action. CJ 18 December 2007, Case C-341/05 (Laval), paras. 88-95. Cf. Azoulai 2008, p. 1349.
CJ 18 December 2007, Case C-341/05 (Laval), para. 94. CJ 11 December 2007, Case C-438/05 (Viking), para. 46. CJ 12 June 2003, Case C-112/00 (Schmidberger), paras. 74 and 77. CJ 14 October 2004, Case C-36/02 (Omega Spielhallen), paras. 35-36. Cf. Reich 2011b. Craig 2012, p. 635-636. Skouris 2009, p. 29.
Cf. CJ 18 December 2007, Case C-341/05 (Laval), paras. 95-96.
Ibid., paras. 97-98. CJ 12 December 1974, Case 36/74 (Walrave and Koch), paras. 17-18. CJ 15 December 1995, Case C-415/93 (Bosman), paras. 83-84. Critically on this topic: Azoulai 2008. This consideration is not only relevant in relation to collective regulation of a fundamental freedom; also in relation to the access of individuals to a recruitment competition the Court has held that given the possibilities for private persons and companies to draft working conditions, there would be a risk of creating inequality should the application of the prohibition of discrimination be limited to public authorities. Cf. CJ 7 May 1998, Case C-350/96 (Clean Car), para. 24. CJ 6 June 2000, Case C-281/98 (Angonese), para. 32. See §3.2.
102. In the context of determining the relationship between the fundamental right to collective action and the fundamental freedom to provide services, the Court of Justice discusses the character and effect of both concepts. Referring to Schmidberger and Omega Spielhallen, the Court reiterates that the exercise of the fundamental right at issue – the right to collective action – falls within the scope of the provisions of the Treaty.1 Therefore, the exercise must be reconciled with the rights, freedoms and principles protected under the Treaty, such as the freedom to provide services. In any way, the exercise of fundamental rights, like the right to collective action, must be in accordance with the proportionality principle.2
103. The Court notes that Article 56 TFEU is directly applicable and confers rights on private parties.3 These rights are enforceable by private parties and national courts are obliged to protect them. Furthermore, the Court reiterates – with reference to Walrave and Koch and Bosman – that compliance with Article 56 TFEU is also required in the case of “rules which are not public in nature but which are designed to regulate, collectively, the provision of services” – e.g. collective agreements.4