Quasi-erfrecht
Einde inhoudsopgave
Quasi-erfrecht (Publicaties vanwege het Centrum voor Notarieel Recht) 2006/A.9:A.9. Other conclusions
Quasi-erfrecht (Publicaties vanwege het Centrum voor Notarieel Recht) 2006/A.9
A.9. Other conclusions
Documentgegevens:
prof. mr. F.W.J.M. Schols, datum 24-03-2006
- Datum
24-03-2006
- Auteur
prof. mr. F.W.J.M. Schols
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS579120:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Erfrecht (V)
Deze functie is alleen te gebruiken als je bent ingelogd.
A number of conclusions that can be drawn from the chapters that have been dealt with, but which are apart from the research questions asked in the in- troduction, are discussed below.
A.9.1. The closed system only has a repressive functionA.9.2. The lack of the Erbverzicht is no lossA.9.3. Procedural requirements and pseudo-succession lawA.9.4. The provision for pseudo-legacies should be worked out in further detailA.9.5. Transitional law regarding pseudo-legacies unacceptableA.9.6. The donation in the sense of article 7:177DCCA.9.7. Article 4:126 paragraph 2 under a DCC is broader than only survivorship clauses and the likeA.9.8. The ‘reasonable consideration’